Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40455799›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Complications of image-guided liver biopsies: Results of a nationwide database analysis.

Markus Graf, Christiana Graf, Sebastian Ziegelmayer, Alexander W Marka, Marcus Makowski, Yannick Teumer, Philipp Paprottka, Nele Willemsen, Jonathan Nadjiri

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Pilot Study on Dynamic Long-Axial Field-of-View [Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  3. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Markus GrafDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, School of Medicine and Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4668-0326
Christiana GrafDepartment of Internal Medicine II, LMU University Hospital Munich, Munich, Germany.
Sebastian ZiegelmayerDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, School of Medicine and Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Alexander W MarkaDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, School of Medicine and Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2111-8177
Marcus MakowskiDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, School of Medicine and Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Yannick TeumerDepartment of Cardiology, Ulm University Heart Center, Ulm, Germany.
Philipp PaprottkaDepartment of Interventional Radiology, School of Medicine and Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Nele WillemsenDepartment of Interventional Radiology, School of Medicine and Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Jonathan NadjiriDepartment of Interventional Radiology, School of Medicine and Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsLiver biopsy is the gold standard for evaluating liver diseases, the diagnosis of liver fibrosis or liver cirrhosis and malignancy. However, it is susceptible to complications, and safety data on liver biopsies remain scarce. The following study examined the complication rates following percutaneous liver biopsies.

methodsWe performed a study using data collected by the German interventional radiology society (DeGIR) from 2018 to 2021 of elective percutaneous liver biopsies. Clinical and hematological parameters, technical features and adverse events were retrospectively examined.

resultsFrom 2018 to 2021, a total of 12117 percutaneous liver biopsies were performed in 194 participating centers in Germany. Complications occurred in 235 biopsies (1.9%), of which 195 (1.6%) were major adverse events. Minor complications in the form of procedural hypotension and pain occurred in 7 and 33 cases (0.06% and 0.3%, respectively). Major complications such as bleeding, organ injury and pneumothorax were observed in 166, 3 and 26 cases (1.4%, 0.02% and 0.2%). Three subjects (0.02%) died as a result of massive intraperitoneal bleeding. Major and bleeding complications were significantly more frequently observed in patients with thrombocytopenia (p < 0.001) as well as in patients undergoing computed tomography (CT)-guided procedure compared to ultrasound-guided one (p < 0.001). Moreover, general and bleeding complication rates significantly differed by the liver segment biopsied (p < 0.001). In contrast, the type of needle size used (p = 0.323), internationalized ratio (INR) (p = 0.09), aPTT (p = 0.98), gender (p = 0.83), age (p = 0.08) and the number of biopsies (p = 0.91) performed did not impact the frequency of major adverse events. By multivariate logistic regression analysis, platelet count, the imaging modality used (CT vs. ultrasound-guided) and the liver segment biopsied were identified as independent risk factors of post-biopsy bleeding (p < 0.001 each).

conclusionPercutaneous liver biopsies are safe with rare procedural morbidity. Our data confirm previous data by showing that post-procedural bleeding was not associated with INR and aPTT in patients undergoing invasive procedures. However, measurement of platelet count is indicated to identify patients with increased procedural bleeding risk. Moreover, our findings suggest that patients with liver cirrhosis as well as patients with complex findings and difficult localizations could benefit from intensified monitoring post-procedural.

Indexed as

Image-Guided BiopsyLiverLiver DiseasesPostoperative ComplicationsAdultAgedDatabases, FactualFemaleGermanyHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTomography, X-Ray Computed

Identifiers

PMID40455799
PMCPMC12129161

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.