ArticlePloS one2025
Hospital-at-home care in Singapore: A qualitative exploration of health system partners' state of readiness, and policy and implementation strategies essential to support scale-up.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Designing care at home as an integrated continuum: insights from Singapore and application to U.S. health systems.npj health systems · 2026Review
- When the older patient meets the emergency department: paradigm shift for a super-aged Singapore.Singapore medical journal · 2026Article
- Eliciting Patient Preferences for the Hospital at Home Programme in Singapore; A Discrete Choice Experiment.The patient · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
rationaleMany Hospital-at-Home (HaH) programs have proliferated in recent years to cope with the increasing demands of an ageing population and global hospital bed shortages. Singapore has implemented its own version, Mobile Inpatient Care at Home (MIC@Home). However, many HaH programs remain small, raising concerns about their scalability. Hence, a clear implementation strategy is needed.
objectivesTo address: (1) What is the readiness of Singapore's health system partners to scale up MIC@Home? and (2) What multi-level strategies are necessary for the successful scaling of MIC@Home in Singapore?.
methodsA descriptive qualitative study design was used. Through purposive sampling, 32 participants (16 HaH clinicians, 11 enabling units, and 5 regulators) were recruited and semi-structured interviews were conducted. The interviews were transcribed using Trint and thematically analysed using Atlas.ti via Braun and Clarke's six-step inductive approach. This analysis was guided by the Health Policy and Partnership Readiness Assessment Framework.
resultsThe key themes were: (1) perceived readiness to scale, focusing on stakeholder motivation and capacity; (2) implementation strategies, highlighting the need for training, collaborations, and operational refinements; and (3) policy strategies, addressing financial sustainability, governance, and regulation. MIC@Home is seen as a viable solution to acute bed shortages, with high readiness for scaling. Effective governance requires stakeholder buy-in, organizational alignment, partnerships, and adequate manpower. Regulatory strategies should be adjusted to sustain MIC@Home and improve patient access. For service provision, standardized guideline and data is vital to prove MIC@Home's effectiveness and safety, while convincing clinicians and patients of its value will increase acceptability. Finally, refining governance and establishing regulations for minimum care standards will support smooth operations and long-term success.
conclusionDespite the challenges of scaling MIC@Home, the findings underscore the potential of MIC@Home to enhance healthcare delivery through identifying readiness and strategies to position MIC@Home as an alternative to traditional care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.