ArticlePloS one2025
MSD: Multi-stage deception for data privacy protection.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
With the exponential growth of electronically transmitted and stored data, ensuring data privacy and security has become a fundamental challenge for organizations and enterprises. Traditional encryption methods have limitations, such as vulnerability to advanced attacks and high computational complexity, that lead to the exploration of complementary strategies like deception techniques for enhanced protection. These methods aim to mislead unauthorized users by presenting protected data as if it were authentic, but the attack resilience is still insufficient. Multi-stage deception (MSD) methods leverage multiple deception strategies, such as complement, swapping, and stack reversal, to improve data protection levels and resistance against decryption attempts. Combining these techniques addresses gaps in single-stage approaches and offers a more robust defense. The proposed MSD method incorporates a classification of encryption and deception techniques and introduces a novel evaluation approach targeting critical performance factors. A tailored pseudocode algorithm is designed to optimize deception for various attribute types, validated through simulations. Simulation results reveal that the MSD method achieves a [Formula: see text] value change in the first stage and [Formula: see text] in the second stage, with an overall accuracy exceeding [Formula: see text]. These findings demonstrate the method's effectiveness in elevating data protection levels while maintaining low computational complexity. The study highlights the potential of multi-stage deception as a powerful tool for safeguarding sensitive information, achieving superior performance in data security. By offering a scalable and adaptable framework, the MSD method addresses emerging challenges in data protection while setting the stage for further advancements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.