ArticlePloS one2025
A new audio cue to object weight resembles a naturalistic weight cue during movement planning but not during weight illusions.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
When a person picks up an object, naturalistic cues inform fine motor planning that is reflected in early spikes in force rate changes. Naturalistic cues to weight can also create an illusion whereby a signal to being heavier leads to the object being perceived as lighter - for example, the size-weight illusion. The present study asked to what extent an arbitrary new auditory cue, one that signals object weight, participates in these effects. In Experiment 1, participants used the new signal to adjust both their peak grip force rates and peak load force rates while lifting an object, consistent with using it for efficient motor planning. This matched how they used a naturalistic visual size cue. In Experiment 2, a new audio cue to heavier weight led to a heavier reported weight - the opposite of a size-weight illusion, and opposite to how the same participants used a naturalistic visual size cue. Thus, while the newly learned audio-weight mapping had similar functional properties to its more familiar perceptual counterpart, it did not show the same signature of automatic processing. These results have implications for understanding the flexible use of new cues and for targeting the underlying mechanisms in order to augment human abilities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.