ArticlePloS one2025
RETRACTED: Consumption quota compilation based on BP artificial neural network algorithm in mechanical and electrical installation engineering of prefabricated buildings.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2026-04-08Concerns/Issues about Article · Concerns/Issues about Results and/or Conclusions · Objections by Author(s) ·
- Retracted
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The traditional quota compilation method has a large workload and requires a lot of manpower and material resources, making it difficult to apply to the consumption quota compilation in mechanical and electrical installation engineering of prefabricated buildings. Therefore, a consumption quota compilation model on the basis of artificial neural network is built. On the basis of the traditional quota formulation model based on statistical theory, artificial neural networks are introduced, and regularization techniques and particle swarm optimization algorithms are taken to optimize the model performance. The experiment was validated using project datasets covering different regions, scales, and types of prefabricated components. The results showed that the mean squared errors on the training and testing sets were 1.2% and 1.1%, and the average absolute errors were 8.3% and 8.1%, respectively. In addition, the determination coefficients on the training and testing sets were 95.1% and 92.8%, and the accuracy was 92.3% and 91.4%. Further case analysis also showed that the prediction error rates of the research model for material consumption, labor hours, and mechanical equipment usage were relatively low, not exceeding 2.48%, 1.25%, and 4.1%, respectively. In addition, in terms of quota compilation efficiency and economic benefits, the proposed model achieved a quota compilation efficiency value of 90.1%. The return on investment in material consumption, labor hours, and mechanical equipment use was 5.03, 6.09, and 5.92, respectively, and the cost savings rates were 6.21%, 4.85%, and 5.48%, respectively, all of which were better than traditional models. Overall, the designed model can optimize the accuracy of engineering budgeting and the ability to control costs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.