ArticleHealth promotion international2025
Examining park features that encourage physical activity and social interaction among adults.
Article in Health promotion international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Characteristics of parks associated with depression in women only: a cross-sectional study of 329,363 adults.BMC medicine · 2026Article
- Personality and spatial familiarity interact to shape affective responses in urban parks: a VR study.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Urban parks are a critical setting that can support good health by providing opportunities for physical activity and social interaction. Therefore, it is necessary to better understand which park features are most important for encouraging active park use and social interaction. This study examined the perceived importance of park features for encouraging park visitation, park-based physical activity, and social interaction among adults in Australia. Participants [n = 232, 42.2 years (SD = 13.4), 53% female] rated images of 43 different park features. For each feature, mean scores (SD) were calculated for the overall sample and by gender and frequent/infrequent park visitors for each park-use behaviour (visit, active, social). 'Good maintenance and cleanliness' and 'trees' were the two highest-rated features for encouraging adults to visit a park and be active and social. A 'peaceful and relaxed setting' was ranked third for visitation and 'sense of safety from strangers' was ranked third for both physical activity and social interaction. Significant differences in rating scores were observed between frequent and infrequent park visitors for all three outcomes. The findings will assist those involved in park planning and design to create parks that are tailored to the specific needs of this important user group. This is critical for enhanced physical, social, and mental health at the population level.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.