ArticleJMIR formative research2025
A Self-Harm Awareness Training Module for School Staff: Co-Design and User Testing Study.
Article in JMIR formative research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Principles of practice for a whole school approach to self-harm: a qualitative study.BMC public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe increasing prevalence of self-harm among adolescents is a significant public health concern. School staff are often the first professionals to notice when a young person is self-harming and are in a unique position to intervene and offer support. However, research indicates that many school staff members feel ill-equipped and lack confidence in how to respond. Negative or dismissive responses may discourage young people from seeking further help. There is an urgent need for targeted training interventions to equip school staff with the skills and knowledge necessary to support students who self-harm.
objectiveThis study aimed to co-design a self-harm awareness e-learning module for school staff in the United Kingdom.
methodsThe e-learning module design and development was guided by a person-based approach over three participatory design cycles: (1) co-design sessions with experts in mental health, self-harm, and school-based training; (2) workshops with school staff to co-design the e-learning module components and explore their views on supporting students who self-harm; and (3) user testing of the prototype and focus groups with school staff to explore acceptability and feasibility. Data were thematically analyzed using the framework method.
resultsTraining content, videos, and quizzes were developed in collaboration with a panel of experts. Co-design workshops with school staff (n=11) informed the prototype module design, structure, and scripts for the training content and filmed scenarios, as well as highlighting potential barriers to and facilitators of implementation. User testing of the prototype with staff (n=20) yielded high usability ratings, demonstrating high levels of acceptability. Analysis of the qualitative user testing data generated four themes: (1) usability, (2) content and design, (3) feasibility, and (4) views on how the training improved knowledge and confidence.
conclusionsThe Supportive Response to Self-Harm e-learning module was developed to enhance school staff's knowledge and confidence in responding to self-harm. It was created with a user-centered design and a person-based approach and underpinned by psychological theory. Initial findings indicate that the training is acceptable and feasible. Further research will involve a mixed methods pilot feasibility study to assess the effectiveness of the program. This will provide the necessary evidence for a large-scale rollout in schools.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.