Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40455445›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2025

Social Drivers of Health and Firearm Storage Practices.

Tarang Parekh, Annaliese Pena, Meghana Bhaskar, Jee Won Park

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Tarang ParekhDepartment of Epidemiology, College of Health Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark.
Annaliese PenaDepartment of Epidemiology, College of Health Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark.
Meghana BhaskarDepartment of Epidemiology, College of Health Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark.
Jee Won ParkDepartment of Epidemiology, College of Health Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Understanding the primary social drivers of unsafe firearm storage practices is essential for preventing firearm-related injuries. Objective: To examine household firearm ownership and storage practices, assess their association with social drivers of health (SDOH), and identify factors associated with unsafe storage practices among adult residents. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional analysis used 2022 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System data from adults in 5 US states. Data analysis occurred from April 1 to October 2, 2024. Exposures: Participation in the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. SDOH include food insecurity, housing insecurity, social isolation, job loss or employment insecurity, feeling stressed, transportation barriers, and financial hardship. Main Outcomes and Measures: Firearm ownership and storage were assessed using structured questions. Storage practices were categorized as safest (all firearms unloaded), intermediate risk (at least 1 loaded and locked), and unsafe (at least 1 loaded and unlocked). Multivariable weighted logistic regression models estimated adjusted odds ratios (aORs) for firearm ownership and storage practices, accounting for demographic, socioeconomic, behavioral and mental health characteristics, and state firearm policies. Results: The unweighted study included 44 736 adults. The weighted population was 52.5% (95% CI, 51.5%-53.5%) female; 1.6% (95% CI, 1.4%-1.9%) American Indian, Alaska Native, and Pacific Islander; 10.0% (95% CI, 9.2%-10.8%) Asian non-Hispanic; 7.7% (95% CI, 7.2%-8.3%) Black non-Hispanic; 25.1% (95% CI, 24.1%-26.1%) Hispanic; 52.5% (95% CI, 51.5%-53.5%) White non-Hispanic; and 3.1% (95% CI, 2.7%-3.6%) multiracial. Firearms were owned in 29.3% of households (17 146 respondents), with 67.9% (11 396 respondents) storing them unloaded, 15.9% (2391 respondents) storing them loaded and locked, and 16.4% (2816 respondents) storing them loaded and unlocked. Unsafe storage was most common among non-Hispanic Black firearm owners (aOR, 2.23; 95% CI, 1.39-3.57). Food insecurity (aOR, 3.09; 95% CI, 1.29-7.40), housing insecurity (aOR, 1.66; 95% CI, 1.01-2.79), transportation barriers (aOR, 2.16; 95% CI, 1.19-3.90), and financial hardship (aOR, 2.22; 95% CI, 1.16-4.28) were significantly associated with unsafe storage practices. Households with children had higher odds of firearm ownership (aOR, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.05-1.43), but lower odds of unsafe storage (aOR, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.26-0.55). Child access prevention laws were associated with lower odds of firearm ownership (aOR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.51-0.63) and unsafe storage (aOR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.40-0.68). Behavioral risks like binge alcohol use (aOR, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.01-1.93) and life dissatisfaction (aOR, 1.81; 95% CI, 1.05-3.11) were associated with increased firearm ownership and unsafe storage. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cross-sectional study of US adults, firearm ownership was more prevalent among non-Hispanic White, higher-income, and highly educated households, but unsafe storage was more common among non-Hispanic Black and lower-income households. SDOH and high-risk behaviors, including alcohol misuse and life dissatisfaction, were linked to unsafe storage. Targeted public health initiatives are crucial for improving firearm safety.

Indexed as

FirearmsOwnershipAdolescentAdultBehavioral Risk Factor Surveillance SystemCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSafetySocioeconomic FactorsUnited StatesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID40455445
PMCPMC12131096

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.