Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40455332›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society2025

Comparison of the O-arm-based navigation system with conventional fluoroscopy for percutaneous screw fixation in patients with fragility fractures of the pelvis.

Masaya Mizutani, Toshiaki Kotani, Ryo Ogawa, Sei Yano, Shunji Kishida, Shun Okuwaki, Shuhei Ohyama, Yosuke Ogata, Yasushi Iijima, Tsuyoshi Sakuma and 5 more

Abstract readComparative StudyMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Percutaneous fixation of posterior pelvic ring lesions in the elderly: current evidence and recent advances.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Masaya MizutaniDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Seirei Sakura Citizen Hospital, 2-36-2 Ebaradai Sakura-Shi, Chiba, 285-8765, Japan. anchan7117@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5814-5224
Toshiaki KotaniDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Seirei Sakura Citizen Hospital, 2-36-2 Ebaradai Sakura-Shi, Chiba, 285-8765, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0659-2970
Ryo OgawaDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Kanazawa Hospital, Yokohama, Japan.
Sei YanoDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Funabashi Municipal Medical Center, Funabashi, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0617-1428
Shunji KishidaDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Seirei Sakura Citizen Hospital, 2-36-2 Ebaradai Sakura-Shi, Chiba, 285-8765, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4798-0195
Shun OkuwakiDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9614-5399
Shuhei OhyamaDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2947-4870
Yosuke OgataDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8898-534X
Yasushi IijimaDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Seirei Sakura Citizen Hospital, 2-36-2 Ebaradai Sakura-Shi, Chiba, 285-8765, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0141-446X
Tsuyoshi SakumaDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Seirei Sakura Citizen Hospital, 2-36-2 Ebaradai Sakura-Shi, Chiba, 285-8765, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4863-3264
Sumihisa OritaDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2676-5469
Kazuhide InageDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0540-4613
Yasuhiro ShigaDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4887-0008
Shohei MinamiDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Seirei Sakura Citizen Hospital, 2-36-2 Ebaradai Sakura-Shi, Chiba, 285-8765, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2553-2148
Seiji OhtoriDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5738-6184

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeFragility fractures of the pelvis (FFPs) are increasingly common owing to aging populations of several countries and the increasing osteoporosis incidence. Surgical interventions, including percutaneous screw fixation, are performed to avoid complications associated with prolonged bed rest for FFP management. However, conventional fluoroscopy for surgical navigation is difficult owing to issues such as insufficient tissue imaging, difficulty achieving accurate screw placement, and high radiation exposure to surgeons. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of the O-arm-based navigation system with that of conventional fluoroscopy for percutaneous screw fixation in patients with FFPs, focusing on surgical outcomes, radiation exposure, and screw-placement accuracy.

methodsThis retrospective multicenter study was conducted between April 2020 and May 2024. Seventy-two patients with FFPs were divided into two groups: O-arm (O, n = 14) and the conventional fluoroscopy (C, n = 58) groups. Primary evaluation parameters were radiation exposure and screw-placement accuracy. Demographic and surgical data, including surgery duration and intraoperative blood loss, were collected for secondary evaluation.

resultsThere was no significant differences in demographic data between groups. Surgeon radiation exposure was lower in the O group (0.1-0.2 µSv) than in the C group (mean exposure: 109.8 ± 61.3 mGy). The screw-perforation rate was lower in the O group (5.7%) than in the C group (20%). No patients in the O group required reoperation; however, three patients in the C group did.

conclusionCompared with conventional fluoroscopy, the O-arm-based navigation system improves screw-placement accuracy and significantly reduces surgeon radiation exposure.

Indexed as

Bone ScrewsFracture Fixation, InternalOsteoporotic FracturesPelvic BonesSurgery, Computer-AssistedSurgical Navigation SystemsAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleFluoroscopyHumansMaleMiddle AgedRadiation ExposureRetrospective StudiesFragility fractures of pelvis (FFP)O-arm based navigationRadiation exposureScrew-perforation gradeScrew-perforation rate

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.