ArticleUrolithiasis2025
The role of preoperative ureteral diameter measurements in predicting difficult access during retrograde ıntrarenal surgery: a retrospective analysis of 234 patients.
Article in Urolithiasis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prostatic morphometric parameters and ureteral access sheath placement failure during retrograde intrarenal surgery: a retrospective cohort study.BMC urology · 2026Article
- The impact of preoperative CT-based 3D visualization model on ureteric access sheath placement failure without pre-stenting.BMC urology · 2026Article
- Ureteral wall thickness as an imaging-based predictor of difficult ureter during ureteroscopic lithotripsy: a retrospective analysis.BMC urology · 2026Article
- Preoperative CT imaging and machine learning models for predicting ureteral access sheath placement success in non-stented patients with ureteral calculi: a retrospective cohort study.World journal of urology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) is a minimally invasive procedure used for the management of renal and ureteral stones. However, successful placement of a ureteral access sheath (UAS) remains a critical challenge, particularly in patients with narrow ureters. Preoperative measurement of ureteral diameter via computed tomography (CT) may help predict access difficulties and optimize surgical planning. This study aimed to evaluate the role of preoperative ureteral diameter measurements (distal, iliac, and upper ureters) in predicting difficult UAS placement during RIRS. A retrospective analysis was conducted on 234 patients who underwent RIRS for kidney stones. Ureteral diameters were measured at three anatomical levels using preoperative CT. Patient demographics, stone size, operative time, and surgical outcomes were recorded. Difficult access was defined as unsuccessful initial UAS placement requiring additional interventions such as guidewire manipulation, balloon dilation, or selection of a smaller sheath. Patients with smaller ureteral diameters at all three measured levels had a significantly higher incidence of difficult UAS placement (p < 0.05). Multivariate analysis confirmed ureteral diameter as an independent predictor of difficult access. Additionally, previous stone-related interventions and patient demographics showed significant associations with ureteral diameter, further influencing surgical outcomes. Preoperative ureteral diameter measurement via CT provides valuable predictive insights into access challenges during RIRS. Routine assessment of ureteral diameter can enhance surgical planning, improve procedural efficiency, and reduce perioperative complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.