ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2025
Cutaneous adverse effects of combination epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor and immune checkpoint inhibitor cancer therapy.
Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Risk of high-grade infections in colorectal cancer patients treated with anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Pooled it
- Multidisciplinary Strategies to Manage Treatment-Related Dermatologic Toxicity and Improve Quality of Life in Cancer Patients: A Narrative Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Chinese botanical drugs for mitigating epidermal growth factor receptor-targeted therapy-associated cutaneous toxicity: immune mechanisms and translational pathways.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeEpidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors (EGFRIs) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) show promising efficacy in colorectal cancer and head and neck squamous cell carcinoma therapy, especially in combination. However, given the many cutaneous adverse effects (CAE) associated with each, there is concern for overlap and exacerbation of toxicities. EGFRIs are associated with acneiform rashes and paronychia, while ICIs are associated with lichenoid dermatitis and psoriasis. Xerosis, pruritus, and eczema are seen with both drugs. Understanding the CAEs of EGFRI-ICI combination therapy may guide the management of toxicities and improve adherence to life-saving therapy.
methodsA retrospective chart review of patients treated with EGFRI/ICI combination between January 1, 2015, and May 21, 2024, was performed. Data on demographics, cancer type, and CAE incidence, duration, and management were manually investigated.
resultsForty-four patients were identified on EGFRI/ICI therapy, with 26 patients (59%) developing a total of 42 CAEs. Patients received cetuximab-pembrolizumab (72%) or cetuximab-nivolumab (28%) therapy. The most common CAEs seen were acneiform eruption (33%) and eczema (18%). Most CAEs were caused by EGFRI (62%) with 12% attributable to ICI, and 24% of CAEs attributed to either/both drugs. Most CAEs were reported as mild to moderate.
conclusionCombination EGFRI/ICI therapy is quickly becoming standard treatment in certain cancers, and the incidence of CAEs is high (59%) in this population. CAEs appear to be skewed towards EGFRI rashes and low-grade severity. A prospective trial is warranted to further understand the impact of CAEs for patients being treated with this combination therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40455297What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.