ArticleClinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society2026
Acute and long-term results of interventional treatment of paravalvular leaks after prosthetic valve replacement with plug devices: results from a prospective multicentre registry.
Article in Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03179969 (Interventional Therapy of Paravalvular Post-surgical or Post-interventional Valve Replacement Leaks With Plug Devices), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Interventional Therapy of Paravalvular Post-surgical or Post-interventional Valve Replacement Leaks With Plug Devices: The German Plug - Registry
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Closing the leak: why should interventional closure of paravalvular leaks deserve more attention?Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2026Article
- Transcatheter or surgical treatment of paravalvular leaks: A meta-analysis of 13 studies and 2003 patients.International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundInterventional closure of symptomatic paravalvular leaks (PVL) after valve replacement has developed to an attractive treatment option for patients at high operative risk. However, prospective and long-term data are sparse.
methodsWe analysed data from a multicentre prospective registry on interventional PVL closure.
results41 patients with symptomatic PVL were included in the plug registry at nine German hospitals from 2014 until 2020. In total 50 interventions with 67 plug implantations were recorded, 46.3% of procedures were performed for aortic and 53.7% for mitral PVLs. In 82% of patients PVL closure was performed once, in 16% twice and 2% underwent three procedures. Indication for PVL closure was symptomatic heart failure with NYHA class ≥ II (63.4%), haemolysis (4.9%), or NYHA class ≥ II and haemolysis (31.7%). PVL closure was completely successful in 76%, partially successful in 10% and failed in 14%. Acute improvement of one NYHA class was achieved in 56.4% and of two NYHA classes in 15.4%. Postprocedural no residual severe aortic PVL was described and residual severe mitral PVL was seen in 4.8%. Postinterventional complications occurred in 21.9%. In-hospital mortality rate was 4.9%. A follow-up was performed after 30 days, 12 months, 3 and 5 years. Calculated mortality rates were 10.1% at 1-year-, 18.5% at 3-year- and 32.5% at 5-year-follow-up. The estimated rates for mortality and/or reintervention (surgical or interventional) were 25.6% at 1-year, 36.8% at 3-year and 45.1% at 5-year follow-up.
conclusionsThe multicentre German Plug-Registry describes a high procedural success rate with clinical improvement in most patients and acceptable long-term outcomes after percutaneous PVL closure. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03179969.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40455223What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.