ArticleAnalytical and bioanalytical chemistry2025
Improving the performance of HPLC-MS using radial flow splitting columns: the analysis of caffeine in energy drinks.
Article in Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Mechanistic Origins of Pressure Reduction, Apparent Efficiency Gain, and Enhanced Detector Response in Radial Flow Stream Splitting Chromatography.Journal of separation science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The management of the mobile phase at the interface between high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and mass spectrometry (MS) has always been important. Due to the necessity to operate the MS under a state of high vacuum, the removal of the mobile phase from the HPLC has always presented as a problem. Hence, the chromatographic separation is limited in flow rate by the capacity of the MS to remove the subsequent mobile phase vapor prior to solute transport to the detection source. Although the efficiency of solvent removal at the interface between HPLC and MS has improved over the decades, there is an increasing requirement for HPLC columns to operate at higher linear flow velocities. If this is to be done without the use of narrow bore or capillary columns, this necessitates the use of higher volumetric flow rates. It is this disparity that continues to make the marriage between HPLC and MS problematic. Herein, we have tested the performance of HPLC with MS detection by incorporating recently developed radial flow stream (RFS) splitting end fittings to standard HPLC columns. These RFS end fittings enable the total flow of the mobile phase to be split so that only the central portion is directed to the MS, which actually increases the efficiency in the separation step due to the flow profile in the column. In essence, the incorporation of the RFS end fittings enabled a threefold increase in analytical throughput compared to standard HPLC columns without any loss in quantitative metrics, and other key findings are also presented.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.