ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2025
Robust Uncertainty-Informed Glaucoma Classification Under Data Shift.
Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Improving Generalization of Deep Learning for Glaucoma Classification Under Real-World Domain Shift via Unsupervised Domain Adaptation.Translational vision science & technology · 2026Article
- An Evaluation of the Mean Teacher Framework for Semi-Supervised Cataract Surgical Image Segmentation.Translational vision science & technology · 2026Article
- Uncertainty Quantification in Molecular Machine Learning for Property Predictions under Data Shifts.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Standard deep learning (DL) models often suffer significant performance degradation on out-of-distribution (OOD) data, where test data differs from training data, a common challenge in medical imaging due to real-world variations. Methods: We propose a unified self-censorship framework as an alternative to the standard DL models for glaucoma classification using deep evidential uncertainty quantification. Our approach detects OOD samples at both the dataset and image levels. Dataset-level self-censorship enables users to accept or reject predictions for an entire new dataset based on model uncertainty, whereas image-level self-censorship refrains from making predictions on individual OOD images rather than risking incorrect classifications. We validated our approach across diverse datasets. Results: Our dataset-level self-censorship method outperforms the standard DL model in OOD detection, achieving an average 11.93% higher area under the curve (AUC) across 14 OOD datasets. Similarly, our image-level self-censorship model improves glaucoma classification accuracy by an average of 17.22% across 4 external glaucoma datasets against baselines while censoring 28.25% more data. Conclusions: Our approach addresses the challenge of generalization in standard DL models for glaucoma classification across diverse datasets by selectively withholding predictions when the model is uncertain. This method reduces misclassification errors compared to state-of-the-art baselines, particularly for OOD cases. Translational Relevance: This study introduces a tunable framework that explores the trade-off between prediction accuracy and data retention in glaucoma prediction. By managing uncertainty in model outputs, the approach lays a foundation for future decision support tools aimed at improving the reliability of automated glaucoma diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.