Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40454918›Full record

Trial reportInternational journal of cancer2025

Randomised trial on treatment of vaginal high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion: Self-administered vaginal imiquimod and laser vaporisation.

Mari Kiviharju, Annika Riska, Ilkka Kalliala, Maija Jakobsson, Annu Heinonen, Joakim Dillner, Pekka Nieminen, Karoliina Aro

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in International journal of cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Mari KiviharjuDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Helsinki, and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0009-0006-3407-6769
Annika RiskaWellbeing Services County of Vantaa and Kerava, Vantaa, Finland.
Ilkka KallialaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Helsinki, and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Maija JakobssonDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hyvinkää Hospital, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Hyvinkää, Finland.
Annu HeinonenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Helsinki, and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Joakim DillnerDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-8588-6506
Pekka NieminenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Helsinki, and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Karoliina AroDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Helsinki, and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0003-3467-7194

Funding

Finnish Research CouncilHUS VTRSigrid Juséliuksen SäätiöSuomen Lääketieteen Säätiö
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High grade vaginal squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) (or vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia; VAIN) is a rare human papillomavirus (HPV)-related cancer precursor, which is commonly treated with laser vaporisation or other surgical methods to prevent progression to invasion. Vaginal HSIL has a substantial tendency to relapse despite treatment, for which HPV persistence is a known risk factor. Imiquimod is a topically applied immunomodulator and has shown promise in the treatment of high-grade HPV-related genital cancer precursors. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and patient compliance of self-administered vaginal imiquimod in comparison to laser vaporisation in the treatment of vaginal HSIL. We recruited 56 women with histological vaginal HSIL into a randomised controlled trial of laser vaporisation and self-administered vaginal imiquimod with follow-up up to 6 months. Follow-up visits included colposcopy, punch biopsies, and cervical or vaginal swabs for HPV genotyping. In per protocol analyses of 26 women in the laser arm and 27 women in the imiquimod arm, 53.8% and 77.8% (p = 0.07), respectively, showed histological regression at the end of the study. No progressions to invasion were detected during the study period. Genotype-specific post-treatment negativity for HPV occurred in 16.7% of the laser group and in 39.1% of the imiquimod group (p = 0.12). Imiquimod had short-term adverse effects, but 93% completed treatment as instructed. We conclude that vaginal imiquimod is an effective treatment for vaginal HSIL and could be considered an alternative to laser vaporisation.

Indexed as

AminoquinolinesAntineoplastic AgentsLaser TherapySquamous Intraepithelial LesionsVaginal NeoplasmsAdministration, IntravaginalAdultFemaleHumansImiquimodMiddle AgedPapillomavirus InfectionsSelf AdministrationTreatment OutcomeAminoquinolinesAntineoplastic AgentsImiquimodhuman papillomavirusimiquimodvaginal high grade squamous intraepithelial lesionvaginal intraepithelial neoplasia

Identifiers

PMID40454918
PMCPMC12334898

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.