Trial reportInternational journal of cancer2025
Randomised trial on treatment of vaginal high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion: Self-administered vaginal imiquimod and laser vaporisation.
Trial report in International journal of cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Randomised trial on treatment of vaginal high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion: Self-administered vaginal imiquimod and laser vaporisation.International journal of cancer · 2025Trial
- Human papillomavirus prevalence, genotype distribution, risk factors, and cervical pathology association in women aged 50 years and older: a retrospective cross-sectional study in Xinjiang, China.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
High grade vaginal squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) (or vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia; VAIN) is a rare human papillomavirus (HPV)-related cancer precursor, which is commonly treated with laser vaporisation or other surgical methods to prevent progression to invasion. Vaginal HSIL has a substantial tendency to relapse despite treatment, for which HPV persistence is a known risk factor. Imiquimod is a topically applied immunomodulator and has shown promise in the treatment of high-grade HPV-related genital cancer precursors. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and patient compliance of self-administered vaginal imiquimod in comparison to laser vaporisation in the treatment of vaginal HSIL. We recruited 56 women with histological vaginal HSIL into a randomised controlled trial of laser vaporisation and self-administered vaginal imiquimod with follow-up up to 6 months. Follow-up visits included colposcopy, punch biopsies, and cervical or vaginal swabs for HPV genotyping. In per protocol analyses of 26 women in the laser arm and 27 women in the imiquimod arm, 53.8% and 77.8% (p = 0.07), respectively, showed histological regression at the end of the study. No progressions to invasion were detected during the study period. Genotype-specific post-treatment negativity for HPV occurred in 16.7% of the laser group and in 39.1% of the imiquimod group (p = 0.12). Imiquimod had short-term adverse effects, but 93% completed treatment as instructed. We conclude that vaginal imiquimod is an effective treatment for vaginal HSIL and could be considered an alternative to laser vaporisation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.