ArticleAugmentative and alternative communication (Baltimore, Md. : 1985)2026
Considering whether brain-computer interfaces have prospective potential to support children who have the physical abilities for touch-based AAC access: a forum manuscript.
Article in Augmentative and alternative communication (Baltimore, Md. : 1985), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) may help address communication challenges for both those with developmental disabilities (DD) and intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD). This forum manuscript explores the possibility of various future applications of brain-computer interface technology for AAC control (BCI-AAC) by children who have the physical abilities to utilize touch-based AAC access. Due to the early status of BCI-AAC research, the forum focuses on those with DD, though considerations for those with IDD are also discussed. Departing from the prevalent focus on severe speech and physical impairments (SSPI), this work shifts the spotlight toward children who may employ touch selection for AAC access, exploring the challenges and prospective possibilities within this population. Applying the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) framework, we explore potential BCI-AAC considerations across Activities and Participation, Functions and Structures, Environmental Factors, and Personal Factors. Proposing prospective BCI-AAC strategies, such as leveraging brain activity for functional intent recognition and emotion detection, this paper is designed to fuel discussion on tailoring AAC interventions to the diverse profiles of children with DD and IDD. Acknowledging the significant hurdles faced by BCI-AAC technology, we support the inclusive consideration of individuals in BCI-AAC development. While not seeking to lay a definitive roadmap, this forum aims to serve as a catalyst for future interdisciplinary dialogues, including those who use AAC and their support network, laying the groundwork for considering diverse BCI-AAC applications in children.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.