ArticleInternational journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering2025
Translation of Animal Study to Human: In Silico Based Development of Implantable Pulmonary Artery Pressure Sensor.
Article in International journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Implantable pulmonary artery pressure sensors (PAPS) might impose a flow-induced risk of thrombus formation in the pulmonary artery (PA). To assess this risk, an in silico study-enhanced animal study with 20 sensors implanted in 10 pigs had previously been conducted. In the in silico study, PAPS were virtually implanted mimicking real implantations, based upon data acquired by CT. This animal in silico study investigated changes in hemodynamics caused by PAPS using image-based computational fluid dynamics (CFD). However, porcine and human PA differ significantly in geometry and hemodynamics. To investigate the transferability of animal in silico study findings toward human conditions, we propose a parallel in silico human study. Based on a similarity analysis (L1 norm for 8 geometric features) human PA geometries with the least difference to 10 porcine PA were selected. PAPS were virtually implanted in human PA as close as possible, mimicking the implantation configuration of the animal study. Finally, a numerical flow analysis of the hemodynamic changes due to PAPS implantation was done. Comparing human and porcine PA, we found significantly larger left and right PA diameters in humans, whereas no differences were found for main PA diameters and bifurcation angle. Comparing hemodynamic boundary conditions, we found a significantly smaller heart rate and a significantly higher peak systolic main PA flow rate in humans, whereas no significant differences for cardiac output were found. The human in silico PAPS study found no relevant changes in hemodynamics increasing the risk of thrombus formation after sensor implantation. This is also valid for PAPS that were non-optimally implanted. Thus, despite differences between species, findings of the in silico animal study were confirmed by the human in silico study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.