ArticleInternational journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering2025
Optimisation of Intervertebral Disc Mechanical Properties and the Impact of Vertebral Alignment in Subject-Specific Finite Element Models.
Article in International journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Biomechanical Analysis on Vibration Characteristics of Lumbar Spine Using a Whole Human Body Finite Element Model.International journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Subject-specific finite element models could improve understanding of how spinal loading varies between people, based on differences in morphology and tissue properties. However, determining accurate subject-specific intervertebral disc (IVD) properties can be difficult due to the spine's complex behaviour, in six degrees of freedom. Previous studies optimising IVD properties have utilised axial compression alone or range of motion data in three axes. This study aimed to optimise IVD properties using 6-axis force-moment data, and compare the resultant model's accuracy against a model optimised using IVD pressure data. Additionally, model vertebral alignment was assessed to determine if differences between imaged specimen alignment and in vitro 6-axis test alignment affected the optimisation process. A finite element model of a porcine lumbar motion segment was developed, with generic IVD properties. The model loading and boundary conditions replicated in vitro 6-axis stiffness matrix testing of the same specimen. The model was then optimised twice, once using experimental IVD pressures and once using forces and moments. A second model with geometry based on the specimen's vertebral alignment from the 6-axis testing was also developed and optimised. The 6-axis force-moment optimised model had more accurate overall 6-axis load-displacement behaviour, but less accurate IVD pressures than the pressure optimised model. Neither optimised model fully captured spinal behaviours, due to model and optimisation process limitations. The 6-axis vertebral alignment model had lower error and different optimised IVD properties than the imaged vertebral alignment model. Thus, vertebral alignment affected segment stiffness, so should be considered when developing spine models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.