Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40454610›Full record

ArticlePharmacology research & perspectives2025

Encapsulation of Carvedilol in Nanomicelles Improves Central Hemodynamics and Target Organ Damage Protection in Spontaneously Hypertensive Rats.

Luciano Parola, Paula Denise Prince, Javier Alberto Walter Opezzo, Jennifer Riedel, Miguel Ángel Allo, Yanina Alejandra Santander Plantamura, Eliana P Bin, Germán E González, Andrea Carranza, Martín Donato and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmacology research & perspectives, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Luciano ParolaDepartamento de Farmacología, Facultad de Farmacia y Bioquímica, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Paula Denise PrinceInstituto Alberto C. Taquini de Investigaciones en Medicina Traslacional (CONICET), Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Javier Alberto Walter OpezzoDepartamento de Farmacología, Facultad de Farmacia y Bioquímica, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Jennifer RiedelInstituto de Tecnología Farmacéutica y Biofarmacia (InTecFyB), Facultad de Farmacia y Bioquímica, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Miguel Ángel AlloDepartamento de Farmacología, Facultad de Farmacia y Bioquímica, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Yanina Alejandra Santander PlantamuraDepartamento de Farmacología, Facultad de Farmacia y Bioquímica, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Eliana P BinInstituto de Fisiopatología Cardiovascular (INFICA), Departamento de Patología, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Germán E GonzálezLaboratorio de Patología Cardiovascular Experimental e Hipertensión Arterial, Instituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas (BIOMED UCA-CONICET), Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Andrea CarranzaDepartamento de Farmacología, Facultad de Farmacia y Bioquímica, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Martín DonatoInstituto de Fisiopatología Cardiovascular (INFICA), Departamento de Patología, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Diego A ChiappettaInstituto de Tecnología Farmacéutica y Biofarmacia (InTecFyB), Facultad de Farmacia y Bioquímica, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Marcela A MorettonInstituto de Tecnología Farmacéutica y Biofarmacia (InTecFyB), Facultad de Farmacia y Bioquímica, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Christian HöchtDepartamento de Farmacología, Facultad de Farmacia y Bioquímica, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8992-9841

Funding

Secretaría de Ciencia y Técnica, Universidad de Buenos Aires UBACyT 2020 n° 200201901100216BA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The hypothesis of this work was that chronic treatment with carvedilol (CAR) administered in a nanomicelles-based formulation (CAR-NMs), which increases CAR oral bioavailability, is more effective than a conventional liquid CAR formulation (CAR-LCF) and is comparable to chronic treatment with losartan (LOS) in improving hemodynamic parameters and preventing target organ damage (TOD) in spontaneously hypertensive (SH) rats. Chronic treatment with CAR-NMs significantly improved central hemodynamic parameters (systolic and diastolic blood pressure (BP) and its variability) to a similar extent as LOS, and with superior efficacy than CAR-LCF. Although LOS was more effective than CAR-NMs and CAR-LCF in reducing peripheral systolic BP, both LOS and CAR-NMs, in contrast to CAR-LCF, were able to significantly reduce short-term BP variability indexes. Both CAR formulations and LOS significantly reduced aortic media wall thickness and interstitial collagen deposition, and lowered TNF-α expression in left ventricle (LV) in SH rats. Only CAR-NMs significantly reduced IL-6 expression and were more effective in reducing ventricular TGF-β expression in LV of SH rats. These findings suggest that encapsulation of CAR in NMs improved its ability to control central hemodynamics in SH rats when compared with CAR-LCF, mainly due to a greater effect on carotid systolic BP and short-term BP variability, resulting in a higher protection against TOD compared to CAR-LCF.

Indexed as

Antihypertensive AgentsCarvedilolHypertensionAnimalsBlood PressureHemodynamicsLosartanMaleMicellesNanoparticlesRatsRats, Inbred SHRAntihypertensive AgentsCarvedilolLosartanMicellesblood pressure variabilitycarvedilolcentral blood pressurehypertensionlosartannanomicellestarget organ damage

Identifiers

PMID40454610
PMCPMC12127884

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.