ArticlePharmacology research & perspectives2025
Encapsulation of Carvedilol in Nanomicelles Improves Central Hemodynamics and Target Organ Damage Protection in Spontaneously Hypertensive Rats.
Article in Pharmacology research & perspectives, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The hypothesis of this work was that chronic treatment with carvedilol (CAR) administered in a nanomicelles-based formulation (CAR-NMs), which increases CAR oral bioavailability, is more effective than a conventional liquid CAR formulation (CAR-LCF) and is comparable to chronic treatment with losartan (LOS) in improving hemodynamic parameters and preventing target organ damage (TOD) in spontaneously hypertensive (SH) rats. Chronic treatment with CAR-NMs significantly improved central hemodynamic parameters (systolic and diastolic blood pressure (BP) and its variability) to a similar extent as LOS, and with superior efficacy than CAR-LCF. Although LOS was more effective than CAR-NMs and CAR-LCF in reducing peripheral systolic BP, both LOS and CAR-NMs, in contrast to CAR-LCF, were able to significantly reduce short-term BP variability indexes. Both CAR formulations and LOS significantly reduced aortic media wall thickness and interstitial collagen deposition, and lowered TNF-α expression in left ventricle (LV) in SH rats. Only CAR-NMs significantly reduced IL-6 expression and were more effective in reducing ventricular TGF-β expression in LV of SH rats. These findings suggest that encapsulation of CAR in NMs improved its ability to control central hemodynamics in SH rats when compared with CAR-LCF, mainly due to a greater effect on carotid systolic BP and short-term BP variability, resulting in a higher protection against TOD compared to CAR-LCF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.