ArticleEuropean journal of pain (London, England)2025
Cognitive Function in Patients With Complex Regional Pain Syndrome: No Clear Impairment Found in a Select Patient Sample.
Article in European journal of pain (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundGiven the impact of chronic pain on cognition, CRPS may affect specific cognitive functions. However, cognitive functioning is rarely assessed in CRPS, and previous studies have examined only limited domains. As a result, it remains unclear which cognitive functions are affected and whether impairments are CRPS-specific. This study comprehensively evaluates cognition in CRPS and compares it to carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) to determine whether cognitive dysfunction is specific to CRPS.
methodsAll patients underwent a standardised cognitive assessment consisting of ten tests, evaluating the domains of memory, concentration, executive functioning, social cognition and performance validity. Standardised z-scores and proportion of low-performing patients (< -1.5 SD from age-, sex- and education adjusted normative data) were examined. Both patient groups were compared with each other and the expected population proportion.
resultsSixty-four patients (n = 39 CRPS and n = 25 CTS) with a mean age of 52.5 (range 20-81) were included. Compared with patients with CTS, patients with CRPS had significantly higher pain scores 24 h before and during the visit (p < 0.001). All cognitive test results were similar between the two groups. Z-scores of both groups were comparable or better than the population norm. Furthermore, proportions of patients with Z-scores below -1.5 SD were similar or better than expected.
conclusionsOur results consistently showed no cognitive impairment in either patient group. Both groups met or exceeded population norms on all tests. However, despite our clear results, attention should be paid to factors affecting cognition, like depression, anxiety and stress. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: This study explores the underexamined cognitive dysfunction in Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS). Cognitive issues, often reported by CRPS patients, can add to the burden on daily life and quality of life (QoL) but are rarely assessed. By comparing CRPS with CTS, this research examines whether cognitive impairments are specific to CRPS. Identifying these issues may lead to targeted therapies addressing both pain and cognitive challenges, ultimately improving patient outcomes and QoL.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.