Trial reportJournal of pain research2025
Clinical Efficacy of Single-
Trial report in Journal of pain research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Transversus abdominis plane block (TAPB) has been widely used for lower-segment cesarean sections (CS). However, traditional single-level TAPB may not provide sufficient analgesia for parturients. This study aimed to validate whether dual-level TAPB could offer more extensive blocking and better clinical outcomes. Methods: A total of 114 full-term parturients undergoing lower-segment CS were included in this prospective, randomized, controlled study. Subjects were randomly assigned to receive either single-level (group SL) or dual-level (group DL) TAPB. Dual-level TAPB was performed at the umbilical level and the level above the anterior superior iliac spine, while single-level was performed only at the umbilical level. The primary outcome was the proportion of the abdomen successfully blocked 20 minutes after TAPB. Results: Twenty minutes after TAPB, dual-level TAPB resulted in a more extensive cutaneous sensory block compared to single-level TAPB. The difference in the proportion of successfully blocked zones was statistically significant, with 46.9% (43.8%, 53.1%) in group SL Conclusion: Compared to traditional single-level TAPB, dual-level TAPB produced more extensive cutaneous sensory block and better postoperative analgesia effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.