ArticleColor research and application
Correcting images for individual differences in color appearance.
Article in Color research and application. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Achromatic loci in normal and anomalous trichromats.Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision · 2025Article
- Warm versus cool colors and their relation to color perception.Journal of vision · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Individual differences are a prominent feature of normal color vision and range from variations in sensitivity to perception and color naming. Corrections for differences in spectral sensitivity are common, and there is growing interest in calibrating displays for the sensitivity of an individual observer. In contrast, few studies have explored calibrations for aspects of color appearance. We developed a technique for adjusting images based directly on an individual's hue percepts and illustrate the principle of the approach using a set of hue scaling functions measured previously for a large sample of color-normal observers (Emery et al. PNAS 2023). Colors in an image are mapped onto the average scaling function to define the hue perceived by the average "standard observer." This hue is then mapped back to the chromaticity that would elicit the same response in any individual observer. With this correction, different observers - each looking at physically different images calibrated for their own hue percepts - should in principle agree on the perceived colors. Adjustments of this kind could be easily implemented on standard displays, because they require only measures of hue percepts and not spectral sensitivity, and could lead to greater consistency in the perception and communication about color across individuals with potentially widely different perceptual experiences of color.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.