ArticleJournal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions2025
High-Definition Intravascular Ultrasound Versus Optical Coherence Tomography: Lumen Size and Plaque Morphology.
Article in Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Introduction and validation of OSCAR-optimal stent choice algorithm.CVIR endovascular · 2026Article
- Response to Letter to the Editor Regarding High-Definition Intravascular Ultrasound Versus Optical Coherence Tomography: Lumen Size and Plaque Morphology.Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions · 2026Article
- Letter to the Editor Regarding the Article "High-Definition Intravascular Ultrasound Versus Optical Coherence Tomography: Lumen Size and Plaque Morphology".Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions · 2026Article
- Prediction of Post-stenting Lumen Dimensions Using High-Definition Intravascular Ultrasound.JACC. Advances · 2026Article
- Patient-Specific 3D Coronary Reconstruction and Computational Simulations to Guide Drug-Coated Balloon Intervention: First-in-Human Experience.JACC. Case reports · 2026Article
- Accuracy of angioboost software versus routine angiography for assessing the degree of coronary artery lesion occlusion.Caspian journal of internal medicine · 2026Article
- Management of Calcified Coronary Lesions-A Review of Plaque Modification Methods.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Apples and Oranges: Comparing High-definition Intravascular Ultrasound and Optical Coherence Tomography.Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
23 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Complex percutaneous coronary interventions rely on advanced intravascular imaging techniques, such as intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and optical coherence tomography (OCT). This study aims to compare the accuracy of the latest high-definition intravascular ultrasound (HD IVUS) and OCT technologies in measuring coronary lumen dimensions and assessing plaque morphology. Methods: We compared HD IVUS and OCT in 8 silicone models using microcomputed tomography as the ground truth. We also compared HD IVUS vs OCT in 12 coronary arteries from 9 patients. Results: In the silicone models, the latest HD IVUS (AVVIGO+, Boston Scientific) system overestimated lumen dimensions compared to microcomputed tomography by +0.06 ± 0.05 mm for mean lumen diameter (MLD). OCT (Ultreon 2.0, Abbott) underestimated lumen dimensions by -0.17 ± 0.06 mm for MLD, with the underestimation being greater for lumen diameters ≥5.0 mm. In clinical cases, the latest HD IVUS (AVVIGO+) system yielded larger lumen dimensions compared to OCT (Ultreon 2.0) by +0.12 ± 0.11 mm for MLD, and the earlier HD IVUS (POLARIS, Boston Scientific) system also showed larger lumen dimensions compared to OCT (AptiVue, Abbott) by +0.26 ± 0.29 mm for MLD. Using OCT as the reference, HD IVUS detected fine wall structures with precision, such as a thin fibrous cap, dissection, and stent struts. Conclusions: The latest HD IVUS (Avvigo+) tends to overestimate lumen size, whereas OCT (Ultreon 2.0) underestimates it. Experimental data suggest HD IVUS provides more accurate lumen assessment, particularly in larger coronary arteries, although both technologies exhibit comparable overall accuracy in the clinical setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.