ArticlePhotoacoustics2025
Revisiting the joint estimation of initial pressure and speed-of-sound distributions in photoacoustic computed tomography with consideration of canonical object constraints.
Article in Photoacoustics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- A virtual imaging framework for three-dimensional quantitative optoacoustic tomography using stochastic numerical breast phantoms.Photoacoustics · 2026Article
- Ultrasound-guided sound speed correction for photoacoustic computed tomography.Photoacoustics · 2026Article
- A Deep Transfer Learning Framework for Speed-of-Sound Aberration Correction in Full-Ring Photoacoustic Tomography.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Artifacts in photoacoustic imaging: Origins and mitigations.Photoacoustics · 2025Article
- Reconstructing multiple initial pressure and speed of sound distributions simultaneously in photoacoustic tomography.Photoacoustics · 2025Article
- Optimizing quantitative photoacoustic imaging systems: the Bayesian Cramér-Rao bound approach.Inverse problems · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In photoacoustic computed tomography (PACT) the accurate estimation of the initial pressure (IP) distribution generally requires knowledge of the object's heterogeneous speed-of-sound (SOS) distribution. Although hybrid imagers that combine ultrasound tomography with PACT have been proposed, in many current applications of PACT the SOS distribution remains unknown. Joint reconstruction (JR) of the IP and SOS distributions from PACT measurement data alone can address this issue. However, this joint estimation problem is ill-posed and corresponds to a non-convex optimization problem. While certain regularization strategies have been deployed, stabilizing the JR problem to yield accurate estimates of the IP and SOS distributions has remained an open challenge. To address this, the presented numerical studies explore the effectiveness of easy to implement canonical object constraints for stabilizing the JR problem. The considered constraints include support, bound, and total variation constraints, which are incorporated into an optimization-based method for JR. Computer-simulation studies that employ anatomically realistic numerical breast phantoms are conducted to evaluate the impact of these object constraints on JR accuracy. Additionally, the impact of certain data inconsistencies, such as caused by measurement noise and physics modeling mismatches, on the effectiveness of the object constraints is investigated. The results demonstrate, for the first time, that the incorporation of canonical object constraints in an optimization-based image reconstruction method holds significant potential for mitigating the ill-posed nature of the PACT JR problem.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.