ArticleGeriatric orthopaedic surgery & rehabilitation2025
The Reality of Physical Restraint Implementation During Hospitalization in Older Patients With Hip Fractures.
Article in Geriatric orthopaedic surgery & rehabilitation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Hip fractures, which result in a high rate of complications and mortality, are a major public health concern in aging societies. Physical restraint for older patients with hip fractures may be employed to ensure safety, continue medical treatment, and minimize the risk of harm to oneself or others. This study aimed to investigate the current practices of physical restraint use among hip fracture patients across 2 acute-care hospitals, as well as uncover factors associated with physical restraint in patients with hip fracture. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed all patients aged ≥65 years who underwent surgery for hip fractures at two institutions. Physical restraint was applied in accordance with institutional guidelines, following thorough assessments by physicians and nurses and obtaining informed consent from the patient or their family. When we examined the independent associations of physical restraint during hospitalization, the Poisson regression models were used to estimate the relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results: In total, 463 older patients with hip fractures were assessed. Among the included patients, 118 (25.5%) were subjected to physical restraint. Multivariable analysis revealed that 85 years or older (RR, 1.8; CI: 1.1-3.0), a BMI below 18.5 (RR, 1.8; CI: 1.4-2.5), dementia (RR, 2.3; CI: 1.7-3.1), stroke (RR, 1.5; CI: 1.1-2.0), impairment in physical function (RR, 3.1; CI: 1.2-8.3), and administration of antipsychotics (RR, 1.6; CI: 1.0-2.4) were significantly associated with the implementation of physical restraint. Conclusions: This retrospective study provided real-world data regarding the use of physical restraint in older patients with hip fractures. Patients with older age, low BMI, dementia, stroke, impaired physical function, and administration of antipsychotics may be at high risk for the use of physical restraints. To minimize the use of physical restraints, future research for further data collection will be essential.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.