ArticleStatistics in biosciences2025
Analyzing Left-Truncated Samples with the Cox Model in the Presence of Missing Covariates.
Article in Statistics in biosciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Delayed enrollment of subjects into a time-to-event study may result in a sample with biased outcome and covariate distributions. Additionally, missing covariate data may arise in these studies when information is difficult to collect due to patient burden or high testing costs. Some common missing data strategies, such as multiple imputation (MI) and augmented inverse probability weighting (AIPW), involve modeling the distribution of the missing covariate, which may be inaccurate with a left-truncated sample. Through simulation studies, we explore the performance of these methods in estimating Cox regression parameters under a variety of truncation and missing data scenarios. We find that MI and AIPW may be approximately unbiased when truncation is very low. Otherwise, biased estimation of the covariate distribution can cause MI to perform poorly. Similarly, AIPW may rely more heavily on correct estimation of the probability of having non-missing covariates in some settings. We apply these approaches to a Parkinson's disease dementia biomarker study. In analyzing left-truncated data with missing covariates, careful consideration of the data characteristics and method assumptions is needed to obtain valid results. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12561-024-09442-9.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.