ArticleCurrent developments in nutrition2025
Comparison of an Open versus List-Based Dietary Recall Method to Assess Unhealthy Feeding Practices among Infants and Young Children.
Article in Current developments in nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Progress in Improving Low-Cost Measurement of Feeding Behaviors and Diets.Current developments in nutrition · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Collecting accurate dietary data is critical for assessing infant and young child feeding practices, identifying populations at risk, and using evidence to inform policy. In 2021, World Health Organization/United Nations Children's Fund released new indicators of unhealthy food and beverage consumption and recommended that survey administrators use either an open or list-based method. Objectives: This study compared infants' and young children' unhealthy food consumption estimated using an open 24-h recall (24HR) compared with list-based 24HR among young children living in peri-urban Cambodia and explored the effect of social desirability bias on respondents' responses. Methods: We conducted a secondary analysis of unhealthy food consumption estimated in a longitudinal cohort study implemented from June 2021 through January 2022 in the rural/peri-urban district of Khsach Kandal, Kandal Province, Cambodia (567 children aged 10-13.9 mo at baseline). Each month, for 5 mo, data were collected via an open 24HR. At the 6th month, half of the children were randomly assigned to also receive a list-based 24HR to collect data on unhealthy food consumption. Results: The prevalence of sweet beverage and unhealthy food consumption and zero fruit and vegetable consumption among young children was high. We observed that the percentage of children consuming sweet foods was significantly higher when estimated using the list-based compared with an open 24HR method (61.6% compared with 43.8%; Conclusions: Researchers must carefully consider the method used for 24HR because this may have implications for respondents' recall and memory. As more evidence is collected on the rising consumption of unhealthy food and beverages among young children, researchers should take into consideration the effects of caregiver's susceptibility to social desirability bias when analyzing these consumption patterns.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.