ArticleCurrent developments in nutrition2025
Progress in Improving Low-Cost Measurement of Feeding Behaviors and Diets.
Article in Current developments in nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The Diet Quality Questionnaire (DQQ) Is a Straightforward Data Collection Tool for Assessing Minimum Dietary Diversity for Women (MDD-W).Current developments in nutrition · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Information on infant and young child feeding practices and on the diets of vulnerable population groups is needed for global and national monitoring and for evaluating the impacts of interventions. Several population-level indicators have been developed to meet this need, but research to support selection of best data collection practices has been lacking. This supplement brings together a set of recent studies that address measurement issues with the objective of advancing knowledge of best practices, with a focus on low-cost measurement methods. Topics include social desirability bias, recall bias, and the cognitive validity of specific approaches and wording for asking questions on diets. The studies in the supplement provide examples of methods and results that can improve measurement and also identify gaps and areas where additional work is required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.