Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40454160›Full record

ArticleCurrent developments in nutrition2025

Cognitive Interviewing to Improve Infant and Young Child Dietary Assessments in the Nepal Demographic and Health Survey.

Seema Khadka, Nisha Sharma, Katelyn Yuen-Esco, Alissa M Pries

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current developments in nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Seema KhadkaHelen Keller International Nepal, Lalitpur, Nepal.
Nisha SharmaHelen Keller International Nepal, Lalitpur, Nepal.
Katelyn Yuen-EscoHelen Keller International, NY, United States.
Alissa M PriesHelen Keller International, NY, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The Demographic and Health Survey (DHS) is the primary source of nationally representative nutrition data for many countries and is important in shaping national nutrition policy, advocacy, and research. Without careful testing and adaptation to local contexts, findings are at risk of inaccurately representing respondents' behaviors and key nutritional indicators. Objectives: This study used a cognitive interviewing approach to assess mothers' comprehension, retrieval, judgment, and response to the infant and young child feeding (IYCF) dietary assessment module questions in the Nepal DHS-8 Woman's Questionnaire. Methods: A cross-sectional qualitative study was conducted in December 2021, using semistructured cognitive interviews, among 54 mothers of children 6-23 mo of age across 3 regions of Nepal. Interviews were analyzed to identify issues in participant understanding of questions, as well as cognitive challenges or benefits of a longer introduction to the IYCF dietary assessment module, as compared with the original shorter introduction and challenges or benefits to using closed-ended compared with open-ended questions. Results: Cognitive challenges were identified, including issues with judgment of certain food categories resulting in misclassification, comprehension of certain concepts, and comprehension of certain instructions for the dietary assessment that resulted in the variability of food and liquids recalled by mothers. Conclusions: These findings carry substantial implications for the measurement of the diet quality of infants and young children (IYC) in Nepal, and similar cognitive challenges may exist in other contexts. Although this current study is not able to answer the exact extent to which the accuracy and precision of IYCF indicators are affected by these cognitive challenges, these findings indicate that current measurements may be subject to over or underestimation and there is a need for further research in this area to understand the degree of measurement error related to these challenges.

Indexed as

cognitive interviewingcognitive validitycomplementary feeding indicatorsDemographic and Health Surveydietary assessmentinfant and young child feedingsurvey measurement

Identifiers

PMID40454160
PMCPMC12125683

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.