SynthesisFrontiers in medicine2025
Prevalence and healthcare burden of inappropriate antimicrobial treatment in patients at high risk of complications from acute respiratory infections: a scoping review.
Synthesis in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A Six-Step Protocol for Monitoring Antimicrobial Resistance Trends Using WHONET and R: Real-World Application and R Code Integration.Methods and protocols · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Evidence of inappropriate antimicrobial treatment for acute respiratory infections (ARIs) is well-established in literature. However, comprehensive evaluations of inappropriate antimicrobial use and associated clinical and economic outcomes for patients at high risk of complications from ARIs are lacking. This scoping review described the prevalence of inappropriate antimicrobial use and its healthcare burden in this patient population. Materials and methods: We queried Medline and CINAHL databases using keywords related to antimicrobials for ARIs in high-risk patients, and included United States studies reporting prescribing patterns, outcomes, adverse events, and costs. Results: Our search yielded 3,383 studies after de-duplication, from which 482 were selected for full-text evaluation based on exclusion criteria, resulting in 32 papers analyzed that included relevant information on high-risk populations. The analysis suggested that patients at high risk for complications experience improper prescribing of antimicrobials for ARIs, which is associated with higher direct and indirect costs, increased health care resource utilization, higher incidence of adverse events, and more severe disease complications. Conclusion: Areas for improving care for this patient population include identifying patients at risk of severe disease and complications from ARIs and following evidence-based protocols for testing, treatment and follow-up to minimize the risk of developing adverse events, antibiotic-resistance, and severe complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.