Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40454135›Full record

ArticleClinics in orthopedic surgery2025

Powered Tool for the Removal of a Well-Fixed Acetabular Cup: A Comparative Experimental Study.

Jun Young Chung, Yonghan Cha, Chang-Ho Jung, Jin-Woo Kim, Jun-Il Yoo, Jung-Taek Kim, Yongho Jeon

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Clinics in orthopedic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jun Young ChungDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Ajou Medical Center, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6944-5812
Yonghan ChaDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Daejeon Eulji Medical Center, Eulji University School of Medicine, Daejeon, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7616-6694
Chang-Ho JungDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Ajou University, Suwon, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8318-4447
Jin-Woo KimDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Nowon Eulji Medical Center, Eulji University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0186-5834
Jun-Il YooDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Inha University Hospital, Inha University School of Medicine, Incheon, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3575-4123
Jung-Taek KimDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Ajou Medical Center, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4243-5793
Yongho JeonDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Ajou University, Suwon, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0183-8652

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Backgroud: The removal of a well-fixed acetabular cup is a challenging, labor-intensive, and time-consuming step during revision hip arthroplasty. Although the advent of the manual osteotome, Explant, has simplified the procedure, it is still a stressful process as it dissipates the surgeon's strength and time and risks an iatrogenic pelvic fracture. Recently, EZX, a powered tool for extraction of well-fixed acetabular cups with semicircular blade was invented. This study aimed to compare Explant and EZX in an experimental condition for their efficacy and safety. Methods: Cementless acetabular cups were press-fitted to 20 hemipelvic polyurethane models using foam adhesives. Ten cups were removed with each tool for comparison of the elapsed time, loads on the entire hemipelvis, periacetabular strain and temperature, volume of periacetabular bone removed, and diameter of the remaining acetabular rim. Strains and loads were quantitatively assessed using strain gauges and load cells for precise and reliable measurements. Results: The mean duration required to remove a well-fixed cup with EZX was 38.5 seconds (range, 25-55), whereas that with Explant was 543.7 seconds (range, 214-1,051) ( Conclusions: The present experiment revealed that a well-fixed cup could be removed using a powered tool with less strength and time and less load on the entire pelvis. Although the powered tool removed a larger volume of bone, the diameters of the remaining acetabular rims were equivalent. This tool may help surgeons remove well-fixed cups in a short time and reduce the deforming load on the bone around the cup without increasing the size of the subsequent reconstruction cup.

Indexed as

AcetabulumArthroplasty, Replacement, HipDevice RemovalHip ProsthesisHumansAcetabulumArthroplastyHipOrthopedic equipmentProsthesis failureReplacement

Identifiers

PMID40454135
PMCPMC12104036

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.