ArticleClinics in orthopedic surgery2025
Effect of Glenoid Concavity Restoration on Surgical Failure after Arthroscopic Bony Bankart Repair.
Article in Clinics in orthopedic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This study aimed to evaluate the degree of glenoid concavity restoration and its effect on surgical failure after arthroscopic bony Bankart repair for recurrent anterior shoulder instability with a bony Bankart lesion. Methods: Forty-one patients who underwent arthroscopic bony Bankart repair for recurrent anterior shoulder instability with a bony Bankart lesion were retrospectively evaluated. All patients underwent 3-dimensional computed tomography (3D-CT) preoperatively to evaluate the glenoid concavity using the bony shoulder stability ratio (BSSR). Bony fragments were incorporated to the anterior glenoid during arthroscopic stabilization procedure. All patients were reevaluated by 3D-CT at postoperative 1 year to assess the changes in the BSSR and the final glenoid bone defect size after bony Bankart repair. Clinical outcomes including surgical failure were evaluated at least 2 years after surgery. Results: The BSSR significantly increased after surgery (26.0% ± 14.0% preoperatively and 35.5% ± 13.2% postoperatively, Conclusions: Glenoid concavity, as represented by the BSSR, improved after arthroscopic bony Bankart repair, and satisfactory restoration of the glenoid concavity led to successful clinical outcomes without surgical failure. The BSSR could be considered an important factor for predicting clinical outcomes after arthroscopic bony Bankart repair. However, further research including more contributing factors is needed to better analyze the impact of the BSSR on clinical outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.