ArticleClinics in orthopedic surgery2025
What is the Reason for the Trend Shift from Dynamic Hip Screw to Cephalomedullary Nailing for the Treatment of Intertrochanteric Fractures? A Comprehensive Retrospective Study in a Single Tertiary Referral Hospital.
Article in Clinics in orthopedic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The prevalence of intertrochanteric fractures is increasing with the aging population. Two surgical treatments, cephalomedullary nailing (CMN) and dynamic hip screw (DHS), have been widely utilized; however, recent trends indicate growing preference for CMN. While several studies have compared these 2 surgical methods, there has been limited comprehensive analysis with a substantial sample size from a single medical center aimed at minimizing bias. Methods: This retrospective study was conducted at a single tertiary academic hospital, analyzing data from patients who underwent surgery for intertrochanteric fractures between January 2005 and December 2021. The study focused on comparing surgery-related parameters, postoperative local complications, medical complications, and mortality between patients treated with CMN and those treated with DHS. Results: A total of 475 patients with a minimum follow-up of 3 months were enrolled. The mean (standard deviation) age of patients treated with CMN (77.0 ± 10.7 years) was older compared to those treated with DHS (73.0 ± 12.2 years; Conclusions: Patients treated with CMN experienced no differences in postoperative outcomes including local and medical complications or mortality compared to DHS-treated patients. CMN reduced operation time, EBL, number of intraoperative and postoperative transfusion packs, and length of hospital stay, especially in patients with unstable intertrochanteric fractures. In conclusion, with comparable postoperative complications and mortality, CMN demonstrated superior perioperative efficiency, supporting its growing recommendation over DHS for the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.