Trial reportClinics in orthopedic surgery2025
Comparison of Landmark-Based Versus Transverse Carpal Ligament Penetrating Corticosteroid Injection for Bilateral Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Prospective Randomized Trial.
Trial report in Clinics in orthopedic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This study aimed to compare the effectiveness and complications between classic palmaris longus tendon landmark-based corticosteroid injection (CI) and transverse carpal ligament (TCL)-penetrating CI for carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). Methods: We performed a landmark-based CI on one hand and a TCL-penetrating CI on the other side after randomization in 30 consecutive patients with bilateral CTS. The pain visual analog scale (VAS) and the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire (BCTQ) were assessed at baseline, 4 weeks, and 3 and 6 months after injection. Skin hypopigmentation of the injection site was evaluated using the modified Vancouver scar scale (mVSS). Pain during needle insertion was evaluated using a VAS for each hand. Results: The mean patient age was 56 ± 11 years (range, 32-77 years), and 27 patients (90.0%) were women. The pain VAS, BCTQ scores, and the incidence of skin hypopigmentation were not significantly different between the 2 groups after injection, but the mean mVSS scores were significantly higher in the landmark-based CI group at all time points. The pain VAS score during needle insertion was significantly higher in the TCL-penetrating CI group. Conclusions: When comparing the pain VAS and BCTQ scores, the difference between the 2 groups was not statistically significant. TCL-penetrating CI causes considerable pain during needle insertion but causes less severe skin hypopigmentation than landmark-based CI in CTS treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.