ArticleACS omega2025
Flavor Characteristics of Different Varieties of Flue-Cured Tobacco Based on Headspace Gas Chromatography-Ion Mobility Spectrometry and Headspace Solid-Phase Microextraction-Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry.
Article in ACS omega, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prediction and visual analysis of flue-cured tobacco aroma types based on machine learning and feature derivation.RSC advances · 2026Article
- Infrared Spectroscopy for Variety Identification and Authenticity Analysis of Tobacco Samples.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Analysis of Volatile Organic Compounds in Wines fromFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In order to investigate characterization and the differences of volatile substances in different types of flue-cured tobacco, the volatile components (VOCs) and relative contents of six varieties of flue-cured tobacco were analyzed by headspace gas chromatography-ion mobility spectrometry (HS-GC-IMS) and headspace solid-phase microextraction-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (HS-SPME-GC-MS). Combined with the relative odor activity value (ROAV), important flavor substances were determined and different aroma components were screened by multivariate statistical analysis. The results showed that 93 and 80 kinds of compounds, such as esters, alcohols, and aldehydes, were detected by GC-IMS and HS-SPME-GC-MS in six flue-cured tobacco varieties, respectively. A total of 19 volatile flavor compounds, such as benzaldehyde, acetic acid, valeraldehyde, and methyl acetate, were selected as compounds to distinguish the aroma of different toasted tobaccos by orthogonal partial least-squares discrimination analysis (OPLS-DA). In this study, more comprehensive information about volatile flavor components of six flavor types of flue-cured tobacco has been obtained by the synergistic analysis of two distinct analytical instruments. Meanwhile, this study clarified the composition and differences of aroma components of six types of flue-cured tobacco, which lays a foundation for the flavor control of different types of flue-cured tobacco.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.