Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40454072›Full record

ArticleACS omega2025

Turning Waste into Resource: Red Mud as a Sustainable Alternative to Class G Cement in Surface Casing Cementing.

Ahmed Abdulhamid Mahmoud

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS omega, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Ahmed Abdulhamid MahmoudDepartment of Petroleum Engineering, King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals, 31261 Dhahran, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6703-9001

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sustainability of well cementing operations is a growing concern due to the high carbon footprint of Class G cement production. This study investigates the feasibility of using red mud, an industrial by-product of alumina manufacturing, as a partial replacement for Class G cement in surface casing cementing. A series of laboratory experiments was conducted to evaluate the mechanical, rheological, and performance characteristics of red mud-based cement slurries. The tests included compressive strength, plastic viscosity, yield point, gel strength, 3-rpm reading, free water content, fluid loss, and thickening time. A comparison of red mud-cement blends to a conventional Class G cement slurry was also considered in this study. The results demonstrated that the incorporation of red mud in a concentration of more than 15% resulted in crack development on the outer surface of the samples with time, and also the sample with 50% red mud showed a very high plastic viscosity, which makes it unpumpable. Red mud incorporation significantly reduced the free water content while maintaining an acceptable compressive strength above the required 700 psi threshold. However, its addition lowered the yield point and gel strength, necessitating viscosifier inclusion to restore suspension capacity. The slurry with 15% red mud showed optimal performance when combined with 0.12% viscosifier, balancing pumpability, stability, and thickening time requirements. The findings highlight that red mud-based cement formulations can provide a sustainable alternative to Class G cement, reducing waste disposal challenges and environmental impact.

Identifiers

PMID40454072
PMCPMC12120603

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.