ArticleACS omega2025
Practical Considerations of FDA's CLAP List to Support Testing of Extractables for Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices.
Article in ACS omega, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Quantitative method comparison in non-targeted analysis using cascade classification.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2026Article
- Challenging the Database: Day-of-Analysis Calibration and UF Modeling for Reliable RRF Use in Medical Device Chemical Characterization.Analytical chemistry · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Chemical List for Analytical Performance (CLAP) was developed to support the chemical assessment of medical devices. FDA CDRH published the list, along with supporting data and with the intention that the chemicals in the list could be used to perform non-targeted extractable and simulated use extractable studies for devices. The list can be used to establish relative response factors and understand uncertainty in the context of extractable and simulated use extractable studies and can be used to demonstrate system and method suitability. This study utilizes the CLAP list to emphasize the importance of threshold identification, "semi-quantitative" assessment during the non-targeted analysis process of impurities related to Extractable and Leachable (E&L), and biocompatibility testing to ensure meaningful toxicological risk assessments. The current paper also highlights the complexity of the testing process, which involves the use of multiple analytical techniques, addresses challenges associated with screening methods, response factor databases, and the use of internal standards, and highlights a data set based on a modified CLAP list, focusing on volatiles and semivolatiles analyzed by GC-MS. The authors conclude that the CLAP list is a practical tool for establishing a basic database for GC-MS and system suitability evaluation if it has been evaluated at the AET level of the study. It has a reasonable analyte coverage at the highest studied level of 2.5 μg/mL, and the list can be used for evaluating system performance beyond direct injection of liquid extracts. Practical considerations for database generation and response factor applicability at various matrices and concentrations are discussed, with a conclusion that relative responses are generally constant at levels of 2.5 μg/mL or above and are rapidly changing at trace levels.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.