ArticleACS omega2025
Machine Learning Empowered a Graphical User Interface on Native Fluorescence to Predict Breast Cancer.
Article in ACS omega, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Time-Resolved Fluorescence and Diffuse Reflectance (TRF-DR) Spectroscopy for Heterogeneous Breast Tissue Classification and Tumor Margin Assessment.Journal of biophotonics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Breast cancer poses a significant global health challenge, requiring improved diagnostic solutions for its timely intervention and treatment. Real-time diagnostic approaches in current practice offer promising avenues for early detection. However, these techniques often lack specificity, necessitating the development of robust diagnostic tools for real-time applications. In the current study, fluorescence spectroscopy is integrated with machine learning algorithms, and a graphical user interface (GUI) is developed for rapid breast cancer prediction. This study records 206 native fluorescence spectra, 103 spectra each from 31 normal and 31 malignant breast tissues using 325 nm excitation, followed by discrimination analysis using different machine learning algorithms, including backpropagation artificial neural network (BP-ANN), support vector machine (SVM), and Naïve Bayes (NB). Comparative analysis reveals that SVM in combination with a polynomial kernel demonstrated the superior performance of accuracy (98.78%), sensitivity (100%), specificity (97.56%), and precision (97.62%), among others. Furthermore, the in-house developed GUI applied to the current data showed the possibility of real-time prediction of pathological breast tissues, facilitating standalone applications.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.