Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40454018›Full record

ArticleACS omega2025

Machine Learning Empowered a Graphical User Interface on Native Fluorescence to Predict Breast Cancer.

Ashwini Amin, Mallika Priya, Jackson Rodrigues, Shimul Biswas, Subhash Chandra, Stanley Mathew, Satadru Ray, Bola Sadashiva Satish Rao, Krishna Kishore Mahato

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS omega, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ashwini AminDepartment of Biophysics, Manipal School of Life Sciences, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal 576104, Karnataka, India.
Mallika PriyaClinical Mind, Boston, Massachusetts 02108, United States.
Jackson RodriguesDepartment of Biophysics, Manipal School of Life Sciences, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal 576104, Karnataka, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4696-9661
Shimul BiswasDepartment of Biophysics, Manipal School of Life Sciences, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal 576104, Karnataka, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-4967-0400
Subhash ChandraDepartment of Biophysics, Manipal School of Life Sciences, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal 576104, Karnataka, India.
Stanley MathewDepartment of General Surgery, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal 576104, Karnataka, India.
Satadru RayDepartment of General Surgery, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Mangaluru 575001, Karnataka, India.
Bola Sadashiva Satish RaoDepartment of Radiation Biology & Toxicology, Manipal School of Life Sciences, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal 576104, Karnataka, India.
Krishna Kishore MahatoDepartment of Biophysics, Manipal School of Life Sciences, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal 576104, Karnataka, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9873-3445

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breast cancer poses a significant global health challenge, requiring improved diagnostic solutions for its timely intervention and treatment. Real-time diagnostic approaches in current practice offer promising avenues for early detection. However, these techniques often lack specificity, necessitating the development of robust diagnostic tools for real-time applications. In the current study, fluorescence spectroscopy is integrated with machine learning algorithms, and a graphical user interface (GUI) is developed for rapid breast cancer prediction. This study records 206 native fluorescence spectra, 103 spectra each from 31 normal and 31 malignant breast tissues using 325 nm excitation, followed by discrimination analysis using different machine learning algorithms, including backpropagation artificial neural network (BP-ANN), support vector machine (SVM), and Naïve Bayes (NB). Comparative analysis reveals that SVM in combination with a polynomial kernel demonstrated the superior performance of accuracy (98.78%), sensitivity (100%), specificity (97.56%), and precision (97.62%), among others. Furthermore, the in-house developed GUI applied to the current data showed the possibility of real-time prediction of pathological breast tissues, facilitating standalone applications.

Identifiers

PMID40454018
PMCPMC12120607

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.