Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40453996›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025

Seeing emotions: an eye-tracking study of emotion recognition in deaf individuals amid facial occlusions.

Yu Chen, Shengqin Cao, Zhiquan Zhou, Kaiwen Cheng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yu ChenSchool of Foreign Languages, Southeast University, Nanjing, China.
Shengqin CaoTechnical College for the Deaf, Tianjin University of Technology, Tianjin, China.
Zhiquan ZhouTechnical College for the Deaf, Tianjin University of Technology, Tianjin, China.
Kaiwen ChengCollege of Language Intelligence, Sichuan International Studies University, Chongqing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Extensive research has demonstrated that facial occlusion significantly affects individuals' emotion recognition abilities. However, whether facial occlusion exacerbate the difficulty in emotion recognition for deaf individuals remains elusive. This study employed eye-tracking technology to investigate the mechanisms underlying emotion perception in deaf individuals under different facial occlusion conditions. We compared the percentage of eye and mouth gaze fixation in deaf and hearing participants as they judged different emotions (positive, neutral, negative) under three occlusion conditions (no occlusion, sunglasses, mask). The behavioral and eye-tracking results reveal that, first, facial occlusion by sunglasses and mask significantly impairs emotion perception and social communication for deaf individuals. Second, the eye area is more crucial for recognizing negative emotions, while the mouth area is critical for recognizing positive emotions. Third, deaf individuals exhibit a "happiness superiority effect," responding more favorably to positive emotions and showing an avoidance bias toward negative emotions. Besides, visual attention allocation strategies of deaf individuals tend to be relatively fixed and less adaptable to task demands. Overall, these findings support the integrative hypothesis of visual function in deaf individuals and provide insights for enhancing facial emotion recognition and optimizing social interaction strategies for the deaf community.

Indexed as

deaf individualsemotion recognitioneye-trackingintegrative hypothesis of visual functionocclusion

Identifiers

PMID40453996
PMCPMC12124317

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.