ArticleAlzheimer's & dementia (New York, N. Y.)
Therapeutic time window of disease-modifying therapy for early Alzheimer's disease.
Article in Alzheimer's & dementia (New York, N. Y.). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Cost-effectiveness of testing biofluid biomarkers to diagnose Alzheimer's disease: a systematic review.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2026Pooled it
- Blood-based biomarkers and early diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease.Neural regeneration research · 2026Article
- Biomarker-Based Diagnosis and Care Pathways for Alzheimer's Disease in the Era of Disease-Modifying Treatments: A Consensus Statement by Belgian Experts.European journal of neurology · 2026Article
- Letter to the Editor "Therapeutic Time Window of Disease-Modifying Therapy for Early Alzheimer's Disease in Japanese Individuals: Analysis Based on J-ADNI Study".Geriatrics & gerontology international · 2026Article
- Worry and Anxiety in the Era of Early Diagnosis and Disease Modifying Treatment for Alzheimer's Disease.Current psychiatry reports · 2026Review
- Early Detection of Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias From Spontaneous Speech Using Foundation Speech and Language Models: Comparative Evaluation.JMIR formative research · 2026Article
- Clinical impact of the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative: A review of studies using ADNI data (2023 to June 2025).Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026Review
- Eligibility for lecanemab treatment in a French memory clinic setting.Journal of neurology · 2026Observational
- Considerations for using amyloid-targeting therapies for the treatment of early symptomatic Alzheimer's disease.Frontiers in neurology · 2026Review
- Clinical characteristics and neuropsychiatric profiles of young-onset dementia: a retrospective cross-sectional study at a tertiary care center in Northern Thailand.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
- Therapeutic time window of disease-modifying therapy for early Alzheimer's disease.Alzheimer's & dementia (New York, N. Y.)Article
- Estimates of current capacity for diagnosing and implementation of new treatment Alzheimer's disease in Slovenia.Journal of Alzheimer's disease reportsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction: Recently approved disease-modifying therapies (DMT) for early Alzheimer's disease (AD), including lecanemab and donanemab, require patients to meet specific eligibility criteria for treatment. These criteria define a limited "therapeutic time window," after which patients become ineligible as the disease advances. Understanding factors influencing this window may help clinicians optimize patient management and reduce lost treatment opportunities. Methods: We analyzed longitudinal data from two observational cohorts, the National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center (NACC) and the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI). At each visit, individuals were deemed eligible if they were amyloid-positive and had a Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score of 22-30 (lecanemab) or 20-30 (donanemab), plus a Clinical Dementia Rating-Global Score (CDR-GS) of 0.5 or 1. We then applied survival analyses and Cox proportional hazards models to estimate time-to-ineligibility based on baseline cognitive status. Results: Across both datasets, higher baseline CDR-GS and MMSE were associated with a lower risk of becoming ineligible (pooled hazard ratio of 1.601 for CDR-GS of 1 vs. 0.5, and pooled hazard ratio of 0.660 per 1-point increase in MMSE score above the lower limit of eligibility). The estimated 75% survival time for patients with baseline CDR-GS 0.5 was over 12 months, suggesting only 25% would become ineligible within 12 months. For those with CDR-GS 1, the estimated 50% survival time was approximately 12 months, depending on the data, indicating that half might become ineligible within 1 year. Discussion: We quantitatively outlined the duration of the therapeutic time window for early AD patients who qualify for lecanemab or donanemab, which is significantly influenced by baseline CDR-GS and MMSE scores. These findings will support more proactive patient management, ensuring timely evaluations and prioritization of patients at higher risk of ineligibility, particularly where DMT access is limited. Highlights: We examined the "therapeutic time window" eligibility for disease-modifying therapy.Longitudinal data from National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center (NACC) and Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) were used to quantify eligibility duration.Higher Clinical Dementia Rating-Global Score (CDR-GS) or lower Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) at baseline were associated with shorter window length.Our results will help optimize the management of the wait time for disease-modifying therapies (DMT) treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.