ArticleCanadian journal of kidney health and disease2025
Lived Experiences of Sexual and Gender Minorities in Solid Organ Transplantation: A Best-Fit Framework Synthesis and Inductive Thematic Analysis.
Article in Canadian journal of kidney health and disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Sexual and Gender Minorities in Organ and Tissue Donation and Transplantation (OTDT): A Survey of Canadian OTDT Health Care Workers.Canadian journal of kidney health and disease · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Organ and tissue donation and transplantation (OTDT) policies and practices lead to differential care for sexual and gender minorities (SGMs). The experiences of SGM patients and caregivers in the transplantation system have not been published. The perspectives of SGMs on how to best address existing inequities are not understood. Objective: To characterize the lived experiences of SGM patients and caregivers in solid-organ transplant health systems, as well as the perspectives and priorities of these individuals regarding SGM-relevant policies, practices and targets for system improvements. Methods: We conducted a series (N = 12) of one-on-one semi-structured interviews with a convenience sample of SGMs with lived experience of the OTDT system. We transcribed interviews verbatim and performed a formal qualitative analysis combining a best-fit framework synthesis and inductive thematic analysis. Results: We revealed novel targets for action to improve inclusive care in the transplantation system directly informed by the lived experiences of SGM patients and caregivers. Targets for improvement included (1) enhancements to shared decision-making between OTDT providers and patients, (2) transparent communication from OTDT organizations, (3) data-driven donor risk assessments, (4) expanded healthcare worker training, (5) inclusive physical care spaces, (6) recommendations for transgender and gender-diverse health system planning, (7) integrated sexual and reproductive healthcare services for transplant recipients, (8) increased SGM representation in medical education and care settings, (9) SGM and OTDT intersectional support networks, and (10) structural facilitation of SGM community advocacy efforts. Limitations: While thematic saturation was achieved with our sample, we recognize that not all SGM identities were represented. It remains likely that additional experiences, beliefs, and priorities exist in the SGM community. Conclusions: The emergent priorities and perspectives of SGMs with lived experience of transplant systems should inform patient-centered equitable health system advancements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.