Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40453885›Full record

ArticleAddiction research & theory2025

Examining the relationship between public stigma, models of addiction, and addictive disorders.

Samantha M Rundle, Abby L Goldstein, Jeffrey D Wardell, John A Cunningham, Jürgen Rehm, Christian S Hendershot

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Addiction research & theory, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Samantha M RundleDepartment of Psychology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Abby L GoldsteinAssociate Professor, Department of Applied Psychology and Human Development, Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, University of Toronto, Canada.
Jeffrey D WardellDepartment of Psychology, York University, Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, and Institute for Mental Health Policy Research, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Canada.
John A CunninghamNational Addictions Centre, King's College London; Centre for Mental Health Policy Research, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health; Departments of Psychiatry and of Psychology, University of Toronto.
Jürgen RehmSenior Scientist, Institute for Mental Health Policy Research, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health.
Christian S HendershotDepartment of Psychiatry and Bowles Center for Alcohol Studies, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.

Funding

Human Laboratory Screening of Semaglutide for Alcohol Use DisorderR21AA026931 · NIAAA · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI HENDERSHOT, CHRISTIAN S · 2019 to 2021
$440k
NIAAA NIH HHS R21 AA026931
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The stigmatization of addiction has been identified as a barrier to treatment-seeking among individuals with substance use concerns. Although some evidence exists that beliefs in different models of addiction (MOAs) are associated with stigma, the research is limited in several ways. The aim of the current study is to understand the relationship between different MOAs and public stigma toward substance use disorders and behavioural addictions. Method: Participants were 755 adults who completed an online survey on MTurk (Mage = 36.2, SD = 10.1, 40.3% women, 59.4% men) and were randomized to one of four vignette conditions describing an individual with alcohol use disorder, opioid use disorder, problem gambling disorder, or diabetes. Participants completed measures assessing perceived stigma towards the vignette character and beliefs related to five MOAs (disease, moral, psychological, sociological, nature). Results: Stigma ratings were significantly higher in the alcohol and opioid use disorder conditions compared to the problem gambling and diabetes conditions. Greater beliefs in the disease MOA were associated with greater stigma in the problem gambling condition, whereas greater beliefs in the moral MOA were associated with greater stigma in all addiction conditions. Greater beliefs in the psychological MOA were associated with lower stigma in the opioid use disorder and problem gambling conditions. Conclusions: The current study provides further support that addictive disorders are more stigmatized than other health disorders and suggests that beliefs in specific MOAs are differentially associated with stigma. Interventions addressing addiction stigma may consider incorporating information emphasizing MOAs that are less stigmatizing.

Indexed as

addictiondiseasemodels of addictionpublic stigmastigma

Identifiers

PMID40453885
PMCPMC12124819

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.