ReviewOpen forum infectious diseases2025
Interventions to Improve HIV Care Continuum Outcomes for People With HIV Who Have Incarceration Experience: A Narrative Review.
Review in Open forum infectious diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Assessment of Attitudes, Barriers, and Facilitators of Pre-exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) Use Among Individuals Involved in the Criminal Legal System in the Southern U.S.AIDS education and prevention : official publication of the International Society for AIDS Education · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
People with HIV who are reentering the community after incarceration encounter multiple barriers to engagement in HIV care and treatment. We conducted a narrative review of recent interventions (2020-2023) developed to address barriers and improve HIV-related health outcomes for people with HIV and incarceration experience in the United States. This review yielded 6 interventions published in the peer-reviewed literature and 4 interventions from the gray literature (ie, informally published interventions). Eight interventions used the strategy of providing reentry services to support engagement in HIV care and social services after release from incarceration. Of the peer-reviewed studies, only 2 reported statistically significant improvements in HIV-related outcomes. Gray literature interventions lacked the methodological details necessary to interpret findings. Systems-level and multilevel interventions were promising but need more rigorous study. To end the HIV epidemic, more innovation is needed to address barriers to care for people with HIV and incarceration experience.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.