Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40453850›Full record

ArticleOpen veterinary journal2025

Endang Suprihati, Lucia Tri Suwanti, Poedji Hastutiek, Nunuk Dyah Retno Lastuti, Akira Ito, Naomi Himeno

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Open veterinary journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Endang SuprihatiDivision of Veterinary Parasitology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia.
Lucia Tri SuwantiDivision of Veterinary Parasitology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia.
Poedji HastutiekDivision of Veterinary Parasitology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia.
Nunuk Dyah Retno LastutiDivision of Veterinary Parasitology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia.
Akira ItoHokkaido Green Pharma Co., Ltd, Sapporo, Japan.
Naomi HimenoHokkaido Green Pharma Co., Ltd, Sapporo, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Leucocytozoonosis, caused by Aim: This study aimed to detect the presence of Methods: Blood samples were taken from the brachial vein of death broiler chickens from several farms recorded as endemic areas of leucocytozoonosis in East Java, Indonesia. Parasite detection was performed by parasitological examination (blood smear) and ELISA serological examination. Results: The results showed a prevalence of Conclusion: These findings emphasize the importance of using appropriate diagnostic methods to control leucocytozoonosis in broiler chicken farms. Furthermore, the results of this study can serve as a basis for developing more effective control strategies against this disease in East Java Province.

Indexed as

ChickensHaemosporidaMicrosporidiosisPoultry DiseasesAnimalsEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayIndonesiaPrevalenceBlood smearBroiler chickensELISALeucocytozoon caulleryiPrevalence

Identifiers

PMID40453850
PMCPMC12124798

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.