ArticleOpen veterinary journal2025
Investigation of clinical and genetic study of bacteria during estrus, pregnancy, and post-partum in cows.
Article in Open veterinary journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Cattle have a high potential for meat and calf production due to their flexibility and high-quality reproduction. Bacterial illnesses, on the other hand, pose a hazard to optimal reproduction. Aim: This study aimed to identify the bacterial type that colonized in the vagina during estrus, pregnancy, and post-partum. Methods: Using normal culture testing, a study was carried out with the secretions of the vagina. Healthy pregnant cross-breed cattle from the farm in order to detect the vaginal microbes. The study included 44 crossbred cows who were 3, 6, and 9 months pregnant, as well as six of each regular cycle (proestrus, estrus, metestrus, and diestrus). Using a syringe and pipette, aseptic cervicovaginal mucus/discharge samples were obtained during pregnancy, non-pregnancy, and postpartum. Gram's staining and biochemical tests were used to identify the samples after they had been managed for culture isolation on blood agar and MacConkey agar, the time of the experiment is 1 year. Results: All 44 vaginal swabs (100%) from cattle with different physiopathological conditions contained bacteria. During pregnancy, in descending order, were Conclusion: Consequently, it is concluded that the vaginal cavity of pregnant cows demonstrates bacterial isolate dynamics influenced by endocrine conditions, highlighting its importance in the reproductive physiopathology of crossbred cattle.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.