Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40453833›Full record

ArticleOpen veterinary journal2025

Formulation and characterization of mangosteen rind extract nanocapsules as a feed additive candidate of poultry.

Andri Kusmayadi, Richa Mardianingrum, Yanti Yanti

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Open veterinary journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Andri KusmayadiDepartment of Animal Science, Universitas Perjuangan Tasikmalaya, Tasikmalaya, Indonesia.
Richa MardianingrumDepartment of Pharmacy, Universitas Perjuangan Tasikmalaya, Tasikmalaya, Indonesia.
Yanti YantiDepartment of Mechatronics, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Mayasari Bakti, Tasikmalaya, Indonesia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The application of nanoencapsulation technology to mangosteen rind aims to increase the stability, bioavailability, and solubility of bioactive compounds. The nanoencapsulation using chitosan and sodium tripolyphosphate (STPP) via ionic gelation yielded the best nanocapsule characteristics compared to other methods. Aim: To investigate the formulation and characterization of mangosteen rind extract nanocapsules (MREN) using chitosan cross-linked with STPP at different ratios as a candidate poultry feed additive. Methods: Ethanol was used as a solvent in the maceration process to extract mangosteen rind. After weighing the mangosteen rind, a solvent was added at a 1:5 (w/v) ratio. At room temperature, maceration lasted for 24 hours. A rotary vacuum evaporator was used to concentrate the filtrate from each extraction process for 20 minutes at a temperature between 40°C and 45°C. Mangosteen rind extract (MRE), chitosan, and STPP were combined to obtain MREN. Chitosan and STPP were used at the following ratios: 1:1, 2:1, 3:1, 4:1, and 5:1 (MREN1-MREN5, respectively). Following mixing, the mixture was homogenized for 5 minutes using a homogenizer, hydrated for 18 hours at 4°C, and then homogenized once more for 30 seconds. With an input temperature of 170°C, feed rate of 15 ml/min, and nozzle atomizer pressure of one bar, spray drying was performed using a spray drier. The final nanocapsule products were then examined for particle size, zeta potential, and morphology. Results: The application of MREN as a candidate poultry feed additive was investigated based on the results of its characterization. The findings demonstrated that the addition of chitosan and STPP to the nanoencapsulation of mangosteen rind extract significantly affected the particle size, zeta potential, and morphology. The particle size increased with increasing chitosan content relative to STPP; the smallest particle size was obtained in the 1:1 treatment at the lowest chitosan dosage. In comparison with the other characteristics, the best and most stable zeta potential was obtained when chitosan was used at 2:1 and 3:1. Compared with the other treatments, the 1:1 treatment resulted in the ideal nanocapsule morphology in terms of morphological features. Conclusion: The mangosteen rind extract nanocapsule product, at a 1:1 ratio, has great potential for application as a feed additive in poultry. Nanoencapsulated mangosteen rind extract products have great potential as feed additives for poultry.

Indexed as

Animal FeedGarcinia mangostanaNanocapsulesPlant ExtractsAnimalsChitosanPolyphosphatesPoultryChitosanNanocapsulesPlant ExtractsPolyphosphatestriphosphoric acidCharacterizationFeed additiveFormulationMangosteen rind extract nanocapsulesPoultry

Identifiers

PMID40453833
PMCPMC12124800

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.