ReviewMaterials today. Bio2025
Regulation of nanomaterials in peripheral nerve regeneration from a microenvironmental perspective: biological effects and mechanisms.
Review in Materials today. Bio, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multi-omics technologies: Novel tools and methods for assessing nerve injury and regeneration.Neural regeneration research · 2026Article
- Nanoparticle-Mediated Immunometabolic-Epigenetic Remodeling Enhances Schwann Cell-Macrophage Interaction for Sciatic Nerve Regeneration.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Functional and Morphological Outcomes of Duration-Dependent Electrical Stimulation in Silicone Conduit-Mediated Peripheral Nerve Repair in Rats.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Evaluation of neurotrophic therapies for sciatic nerve injury in mice.Romanian journal of morphology and embryology = Revue roumaine de morphologie et embryologieArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The pathological microenvironment following peripheral nerve injury (PNI) comprises a dynamic interplay of cellular and molecular events that critically influence neuronal regeneration and functional recovery. Recent advances in nanotechnology have demonstrated the transformative potential of nanomaterials (NMs) in nerve repair, capitalizing on their unique physicochemical properties to engineer a pro-regenerative milieu that facilitates axonal regrowth. This review systematically explores the biological mechanisms by which NMs modulate and remodel the injury niche, thereby enhancing peripheral nerve regeneration (PNR). Specifically, this review highlights five key microenvironmental regulators, including rebuilding remyelinating Schwann cells, balancing the immune microenvironment, forming blood vessels, constructing extracellular matrix, and regulating cytokines and hormones. By analyzing these NMs-mediated therapeutic strategies, we provide novel mechanistic insights and discuss translational opportunities for next-generation nanomedicine in PNR therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.