ArticleTetrahedron letters2025
On the Unexpected Formation of [2.2.1]- and [2.1.1]Homotriblattanes.
Article in Tetrahedron letters, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A new class of polycyclic caged compounds, the [2.n.1]homotriblattanes, is described herein. These scaffolds are accessed through a concise, three-step sequence featuring an unexpected radical cyclization of α-bromocyclopropyl ketones. Their structures and stereochemical assignments were confirmed by a combination of 2D NMR and X-ray crystallography. DFT studies provide mechanistic insight into their formation and the side products formed en route. This study expands the known chemical space of polycyclic cages and offers a new entry point into highly complex 3-dimensional frameworks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.