ArticleHealth promotion perspectives2025
Artificial intelligence survival models for identifying relevant risk factors for incident diabetes in Azar cohort population.
Article in Health promotion perspectives, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This study aimed to identify some risk factors associated with time to diabetes type II events using artificial intelligence (AI) survival models (SM) in a population cohort from East Azerbaijan, Iran. Methods: Data from Azar-Cohort spanning from 2014 to 2020 was analyzed using the random forest (RF) variable selection method along with Cox regression to identify the most relevant risk factors associated with diabetes. We then developed prediction models using RF survival analysis. Lasso-variable selection and RF variable selection were used to select the most important variables. The concordance index (C-index) was used to evaluate the concordance of the prediction models. Results: Our LASSO-Cox regression identified six factors to be significantly associated with diabetes: age, mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration (MCHC), waist circumference (WC), body mass index (BMI), use of sleep medication, and hypertension stage 1 and stage 2. The model included all variables with a C-index of 76.3%. In contrast, the RF analysis identified 21 important variables predicting a higher probability of having diabetes. Of those, WC, MCHC, triglyceride, and age were the most important predictors of diabetes. The RF model converged after 500 trees with an out-of-bag (OOB) of 0.28 and a C-index of 79.5%. Conclusion: RF machine learning algorithms and LASSO-Cox regression analyses consistently identified WC, hypertension, and MCHC as the main risk factors for developing diabetes. The RF approach demonstrated slightly better accuracy in predicting the likelihood of diabetes at different time points.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.