Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40453678›Full record

ArticleJournal of contextual behavioral science2025

Masculinity, Social Connection, and Loneliness: A Contextual Behavioral Science Approach to Men's Social Relationships and Intimacy.

Elizabeth C Neilson, Daniel W M Maitland

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of contextual behavioral science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Elizabeth C NeilsonDepartment of Psychology and Counseling, University of Missouri - Kansas City, 5030 Cherry Street, Kansas City, MO 64410, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-4138-8748
Daniel W M MaitlandDepartment of Psychology and Counseling, University of Missouri - Kansas City, 5030 Cherry Street, Kansas City, MO 64410, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-9196-3659

Funding

Examining Social Intimacy in Cardiovascular Disease Biomarkers Associated with LonelinessR16GM150756 · NIGMS · BOWLING GREEN STATE UNIVERSITY · PI MAITLAND, DANIEL WILLIAM MOHANDAS · 2023 to 2023
$178k
NIGMS NIH HHS R16 GM150756
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Loneliness-the discrepancy between actual and desired levels of social connection-is a pervasive public health concern. Research suggests that many men report loneliness and desire more intimate relationships. The Interpersonal Process Model of Intimacy posits that intimacy, the meaningful connection between two individuals, is a critical variable in preventing loneliness and develops through a bidirectional process of vulnerable self-disclosure, responsiveness, and perceived partner responsiveness. This manuscript applies the Interpersonal Process Model of Intimacy, as interpreted from a contextual behavior science lens, to contextualize the existing research on masculinity and men's social relationships to inform future research and clinical practice. We review the research on men's engagement in different components of the model (vulnerable self-disclosure, responsiveness, perceived partner responsiveness), emphasizing how masculinity inform men's behavior. Research indicates that men often do not engage in behaviors essential to a contextual behavioral model of intimacy (e.g., vulnerable emotions, distress, or asking for help) because such behaviors are inconsistent with masculinity. Research also indicates men often do not acknowledge others' disclosures or respond with judgment or confusion. Men may also perceive responsiveness as stressful due to social proscriptions regarding receiving help. We discuss implications for research and clinical interventions to ameliorate men's loneliness.

Indexed as

Contextual behavioral scienceIntimacyLonelinessMasculinities

Identifiers

PMID40453678
PMCPMC12121954

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.